9389

• UCREFRP Catalog Number: 9389
• Author: Birchell, G. J., K. Chrisopherson, C. Crosby, T. Crowl, J. Gourley, M. Townsend, S. Goeking, T. Modde, M. Fuller and P. Nelson.
• Title: The Levee Removal Project
• USFW Year: 2002.
• USFW - Doc Type: Assessment of Floodplain Habitat Restoration in the Middle Green River.
• Copyright Material: NO

LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1.1. Original Levee Removal Study design prior to levee removal in 1997 and
1998 .. .................................................1.14
Table 2.1. Summarization table of primary attributes for all Green River floodplain
wetlands sampled during the Levee Removal Study .. ............2.12
Table 2.2. Table associating floodplain sites with corresponding Green River
reaches. Reach boundaries designate distance in river kilometers from
Green/Colorado confluence .................................2.13
Table 3.1. Concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus (Ng I-') in the bioassay
treatments on day zero of the experiments in each flood period. ....3.15
Table 3.2. ANOVA results for light and nutrients in the river ................. 3.15
Table 3.3. Two-way ANOVA results for day 4 of the nutrient bioassay experiments
for April through June, 1999 ................................3.16
Table 4.1. Two-way ANCOVA results for temperature and mean water column
light ...................................................4.19
Table 4.2. Two-way ANCOVA results for nitrate, ammonium, and
orthophosphate ..........................................4.20
Table 4.3. Two-way ANCOVA results for chlorophyll a and NPP .............4.21
Table 5.1. Monitoring and sample design: river area sampled adjacent to floodplain
includes; above, mid, and below; floodplain includes; inflow, outflow, and
flooded habitat. Parameters sampled include; water quality, dissolved
oxygen, drift, benthos, zooplankton, velocity and temperature. .....5.16
Table 5.2. Physical description of floodplain sites. Data were unavailable for 4 of the
total 12 sites. Note that all data are relative to a river discharge of about
364 m3/s ...............................................5.17
Table 5.3. Two-way ANOVA results comparing invertebrate taxa densities between
main channel and floodplain habitats (site) and sampling periods (pre-,
during, and post-) ........................................5.17
Table 5.4. One-way ANOVA results comparing drifting invertebrates leaving the
floodplain sites versus drifting invertebrates in the main channel ....5.18
xv