Laserfiche WebLink
^. <br />- ~ ~ ~~. <br />~: ~,_ <br />6b <br />These are believed to have been downstream. migrants (Peterson, <br />1963). <br />The survival time of the small carp in the live cages varied <br />from one to four hours after initial rotenone contact. The test carp <br />at station #11 did not begin to lose their equilibrium for nearly <br />three hours after initial exposure. After four hours, the young <br />carp were so weak that they were pressed together at the down- <br />stream end of the cage; death followed shortly. Differences in <br />survival duration probably were primarily due to the fish being <br />exposed to different concentrations of rotenone. Variations in the `- =' <br />natural toxic resistance of test fish may also account for some of ~°r~ <br />..; <br />the differences. Adult carp in the river near station #9 were first <br />observed in distress 105 minutes after exposure. <br />After the closure of each rotenone introduction station, the <br />river below remained contaminated until all the rotenone from up- - <br />stream stations had either decomposed or dispersed downstream. <br />Accumulations of rotenone downstream subjected the lower sections ~' <br />of the river to very extended periods of contamination. For ~ <br />example, at Green River City, rotenone was first present on <br />September 6 at 0100 hours; Henderson {1963) reported finding at <br />Ieast 0, I ppm of rotenone at about 1200 hours on September 11. <br />Rotenone was thus present for at least 131 hours (5-1/2 days). <br />Assuming a river flow of one mile per hour, the rotenone from <br />