Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />This document is the Annual Summary Report for 1993 submitted to the Utah Division of Wildlife Resource <br />in partial fulSllment of Contract No. 90-2558 entitled Endangered Fish Studies of the Lower Green and <br />Colorado Rivers, Cataract Canyon, and Lake Powell Inflow. This investigation represents the ninth year of <br />studies by BIO/WEST, Inc. in this region of the Upper Colorado River Basin that began in 1985. Prior to <br />1990, these investigations were supported by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Annual Summary <br />Reports were submitted for each of the first three years (Valdez 1985, Valdez 1987,1988), and a Final Report <br />(Valdez 1990) summarized the results from 1985 through 1988. Annual Summary Reports for 1989 - 1992 <br />(Valdez and Masslich 1990,1991; Valdez and Cowdell 1992,1993) are similar to this report. These annual <br />' reports and trip progress reports are available from BIO/WEST or UDWR in Salt Lake City, UT. <br />1.1 OBJECTIVES <br />The objectives of this investigation were to assess survival of age-0 Colorado squawfish and assist the <br />Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program (ISMP, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987). <br />' 1.2 BACKGROUND <br />This investigation was conducted as part of UDWR's Native Species Program on endangered fishes of the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin. That program is part of the responstbility of states, under the Wildlife <br />Coordination Act and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, to protect and, where possible, <br />promote the recovery of these fishes. <br />' The Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius is a large piscivorous cyprinid native to the Colorado River <br />Basin, and listed a federally endangered species by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Squawflsh typically <br />spawn July through August when water temperatures reach 18-22°C (Vanicek and Kramer 1969, Holden and <br />' Stalnaker 1975, Seethaler 1978). Incubation time is usually 3-4 days (Hammon 1981), and newly hatched <br />larvae can be transported by river currents for varying distances downstream to nursery habitats ('I'yus and <br />Haines 1991, Valdez 1990). Age-0 squawfish are abundant in backwaters sampled during late summer and fall <br />on the Green and Colorado rivers above their confluence (Holden and Stalnaker 1975, Valdez 1990, Tyus and <br />Haines 1991). <br />Little is known about survival ofage-0 Colorado squawftsh. Kaeding et al. (1985) hypothesized that high early- <br />life mortality might be an important factor limiting Colorado squawfish populations in the upper basin. <br />Research at that time on the Green and Colorado rivers by Valdez (1985,1986) revealed relatively low numbers <br />of age-0 squawfish in backwaters sampled during June and July. Increased concern over recruitment of age-0 <br />' squawfish coupled with data suggesting high over-winter losses, prompted additional sampling of the Green <br />and Colorado Rivers above their confluence. Systematic monitoring of age-0 squawfish, consistent with the <br />ISMP, was incorporated into the Cataract Canyon Studies in 1987. This ongoing program was designed to test <br />three hypothesis associated with apparent over-winter decreases in age-0 Colorado squawfish. These <br />hypotheses are: <br />Ho 1: Age-0 squawfish use habitats unavailable to conventional seining methods. <br />' Ho 2: Age-0 squaw6sh move or are transported into and from the region. <br />' Ho 3: Ovetwinter mortality contributes to decreases of age-0 squawfish. <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />