My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6010
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:30:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6010
Author
Binns, A., et al.
Title
The Planning, Operation, and Analysis of the Green River Fish Control Project.
USFW Year
1964.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- 22 - <br />of all species and sizes were salvaged along the entire river <br />by the public for use as bait or food. At no time did a buildup of fish <br />produce a nzisance problem . <br />Post-Treatment Investigations <br />In the six mohths following treatment, an attempt was made to <br />determine the exact extent of fish reduction. Fish population checks were <br />made with gill nets and rotenone as long as weather and ice conditions <br />permitted. Subsequent winter investigations were made with dynamite. Over- <br />night gill net sets were made in the numerous locations yielding fish prior <br />to treatment. After treatment no fish were taken in the sets below Big <br />Piney, and whitefish were the only species caught above that point. The <br />whitefish were probably downstream migrants from untreated waters. In October <br />small unidentified fish, probably cyprinids, were seen approximately six <br />miles below Green River Station 1. In November, additional unidentified <br />fish were seen in the New Fork River between Stations 1 and 2, and two redside <br />shiners were captured with a handnet in a backwater below Station 2. Tn <br />addition, rotenone spot checks in the upper treatment area revealed the <br />presence of numerous suckers and cyprinid fry and fingerling in some of the <br />small backwaters. <br />In October rotenone spot checks were made on the disconnected sloughs <br />and backwaters along the New Fork drainage where small carp were found prior <br />to treatment. Numerous fish, including trout and carp, were still present in <br />some of the sloughs sampled. A single brown trout and a few dozen sucker <br />fry were found in a small, side-channel dam about ten miles below New Fork <br />Station 1. The fry were probably newly hatched and the larger fish may <br />well 'nave been downstream migrants. Water temperatures in the sloughs were <br />in the low forties when the fish were: discovered and retreatment at that <br />time was deferred until the spring of 1.963. ti-~ <br />Sampling by underwater dynamite detonation was initiated in late <br />November when ice conditions precluded the effective use of gill nets. As of <br />April 1, 1963 a comprehensive dynamite sampling program on all main stream <br />waters has produced only a few whitefish in the upper treated area. From <br />September 20, 1962 to November 28, 1962 Petroleum Geophysical Company of Denver, <br />Colorado carried on intensive seismographic survey operations on the Green <br />River. From the town of Green River, Wyoming to a point about three miles down- <br />stream from the Utah-Wyoming state line, 275 underwater detonations at one-fourth <br />mile intervals, using high velocity 40-60 percent nitroglycerine explosive, <br />were made. All "shots" were made in the Green River proper at water depths <br />of from two to six feet. During the period of these seismographic operations, <br />the river water was clear and visibility was excellent. Petroleum Geophysical <br />Corporation reported that no fish were observed in this section of the river. <br />Comparative observations, before and after treatment, indicate almost <br />total destruction of the aquatic invertebrate fauna present in the river prior <br />to treatment. The pretreatment aquatic invertebrate fauna included the follow- <br />ing forms: Hydracarina, Gastropoda, Annelida, Nematoda, Diptera, Ephemeroptera, <br />Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Odonata, and Lepidoptera. <br />Representatives of all of these groups, except Lepidoptera, have been found in <br />invertebrate collections made since the treatment, but as of March 1 none of <br />the forms had regained their former distribution in the river. It is planned <br />to continue fish and invertebrate population studies in order to establish the <br />rate and degree of reccvery of river fauna. <br />-~ . .. `'ram;" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.