My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6010
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:30:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6010
Author
Binns, A., et al.
Title
The Planning, Operation, and Analysis of the Green River Fish Control Project.
USFW Year
1964.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 9 - <br />valves were located between sections so as to allow maximum stream coverage. <br />In general, except for increased weight, the hose-line system and installa- <br />tion was basically similar to that previously described. However, two minor <br />modifications were necessitated by the planned use of airboats which do not <br />lend themselves to, ready portage. Either the hose line at the station <br />end was sufficiently high to clear an airboat engine or the terminal end was <br />anchored into the stream bed so as to allow a clear channel near the far <br />bank. Secondly, each line was draped with brightly colored markers so that <br />airboat operators could spot them from considerable distances (Figure ~-). <br />General Treatment Plan <br />With information supplied by U.S. Geological Survey, it was <br />determined that the velocities of all major streams, in September, would be <br />between 1-1~2 miles per hour, even with unseasonable water volumes. This <br />rate estimate was verif~,ed by field observations made during the 1961 pilot <br />study. With reasonable assurance that stream velocities would not fall <br />below this range, it was decided, for simplicity, to plan all schedules on <br />the basis of one mile per hour. <br />If all stations had been placed in operation at consecutive ten-hour <br />time intervals, the entire project treatment tine would have exceeded nine <br />days and greatly increased many budgetary, personnel and logistic requirements. <br />By starting stations at consecutive three-hour intervals, total time was reduced <br />to three days, with a minimum possibility of either excessive rotenone overlap <br />or incomplete coverage. Based on a ten-mile space interval, a three-hour starting <br />interval, and a stream velocity of one mile per hour, a complete operational <br />schedule was calculated for the Green River proper. From this it was possible <br />to estimate the approximate locations of rotenone bearing waters at any given <br />time and to coordinate the treatment of tributaries so as to provide a margin of <br />rotenone overlap at all mainstream confluences. All mainstream dispensing sta- <br />tions were located, and installed to conform to this schedule. <br />The installation of station cable lines was started about one month <br />prior to the proposed treatment date. A cable crew of four men could, with <br />extreme effort, sometimes rig three units during daylight hours. Some sites <br />presented special problems that greatly increased time requirements, and many <br />hours were consumed in transporting equipment and personnel. <br />Aerial reconnaissance and photographs indicated the presence of <br />numerous backwaters and side channels along the entire length of the river <br />proper. Many such areas could receive little or no rotenone from the <br />mainstream. To assure adequate treatment of these, three airboats, (Figure 5), <br />were scheduled to coordinate their activities with the general treatment <br />operations. Because of their shallow draft and high speed, airboats can <br />easily navigate river shoals and bars. Prior to the Green River treatment, <br />airboat personnel made familiarization trips along all mainstream waters. <br />They verified that two-man airboat crews, equipped with supplies of rotenone <br />aril back-pack pumping units would have relatively easy access for treatment <br />of all backwater areas on the Green and New Fork Rivers, (Figure 6). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.