My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9425
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9425
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:29:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9425
Author
Bezzerides, N. and K. Bestgen.
Title
Status Review of Roundtail Chub
USFW Year
2002.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Ranges longer than 20 lcm were mapped as continuous, shaded segments on the <br />distribution maps of all three species. To fill in gaps in range data coverage, point <br />' collection locations were spatially transformed to range data using the reach associated <br />with each collection point (river reaches were determined from the EPA's RF1 file, <br />' which was used as the stream layer for distribution maps). A species may not occur in <br />the entire shaded reach as shown due to this transformation, and/or presence of <br />unsuitable habitat, migration barriers, etc. in the mapped reaches. Overall, the high <br />density of point data suggested that such reach mapping errors would be minimal. <br />' It is important to note that collection points on distribution maps only provide <br />information about spatio-temporal distribution of sampling effort and associated fish <br />capture, and should not be interpreted to represent fish abundance. Points only mean that <br />an unspecified number of a study species were collected at that location on a particular <br />date. However, repeated collection of a species at a point or within a certain river reach <br />may mean that the area is often occupied or traversed by that species. Alternatively, <br />' repeated collection of a species at a point or within a certain river reach may mean that <br />the area is often sampled. <br />Of the roughly 25,000 collection records gathered during this study, approximately <br />15,000 came from records of specimens catalogued in the fish-collection database of the <br />LFL. The CRB portion of the LFL fish-collection database includes collections from <br />1980 to the present, with locality records available from a large portion of the UCRB <br />including the mainstem Green and Colorado rivers in Utah and Colorado, and tributaries <br />' such as the Yampa, White, and Gunnison rivers. <br />' Approximately 2,300 point collection records were generated through examination of <br />literature sources. Literature-based point collection records covered years 1853 to <br />present and were widely scattered throughout the C12B. Additional records were mapped <br />from fish collection databases at Arizona State University, Cornell University, Humboldt <br />' State University, the Illinois Natural History Survey, the Tu1ane University Museum of <br /> <br />Final Report September 2002 <br />1Z <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.