My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7759
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7759
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:28:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7759
Author
Beyers, D. W. and M. S. Farmer.
Title
Effects of Copper and Zinc on Olfaction of Colorado Squawfish as Estimated by Behavioral Assay.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Biological Significance <br />Toxicity of copper and zinc to olfactory receptors is <br />affected by water hardness, pH, alkalinity, and suspended and <br />dissolved materials (Sprague 1985; Klaprat et al. 1992). <br />Equations from USEPA water quality criteria predict average <br />concentrations of copper (USEPA 1985) and zinc (USEPA 1980) for <br />protection of freshwater aquatic organisms based on water <br />hardness. For dilution water used in our experiments, calculated <br />criteria values are greater than, or fall within the 950 <br />confidence intervals for ECls for all exposures except the 96-h <br />zinc exposure for which there was no significant concentration <br />response (Table 3). The .criteria value for copper is <br />particularly high compared to the 24-h EC1. It is about 22 times <br />greater than the EC1 and falls outside of the 95o confidence <br />interval suggesting that the difference is significant. Criteria <br />values for other exposures fall within the EC1 confidence <br />intervals; however, confidence intervals are relatively broad, <br />probably because of a lack of data with > 50% probability of <br />inhibition. Broad confidence intervals may also reflect the <br />general statistical property of binomial data of greater <br />variability at extreme proba3~ilities compared to the median <br />(Zar 1984). This is a disadvantage of using EC1, but despite <br />broadening confidence intervals at the to level, the predicted <br />value should, on the average, be an accurate estimate of the <br />concentration-response relation (Stephan and Rogers 1985). <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.