My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9555
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9555
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:28:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9555
Author
Bestgen, K. R., C. D. Walford, A. A. Hill and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Native Fish Response to Removal of Non-native Predator Fish in the Yampa River, Colorado.
USFW Year
2007.
USFW - Doc Type
140,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and water temperature conditions should provide a basis for understanding critical spawning <br />periods and means to reduce bass survival. Otolith evidence also suggested fast growth of age-0 <br />smallmouth bass to a predatory size in the Yampa River, which has negative consequences for <br />native fish survival. Evidence we gathered collectively suggested that habitat changes during <br />drought, and associated higher abundances of smallmouth bass, have resulted in reduced <br />diversity, distribution, and abundance of native fishes in the study area. There are several <br />hypotheses that may explain why native fishes have not responded to predator removal in the <br />study area. The first is that an insufficient number of predator fish may have been removed. A <br />second and associated hypothesis is that habitat change, in the form of altered flows and water <br />temperatures, has differentially favored smallmouth bass and reduced native fishes during the <br />recent drought period. However, a direct effect of habitat change on much reduced abundance of <br />small-bodied native fishes seems unlikely. A third potential explanation for lack of a small- <br />bodied native fish response to predator removal may be an insufficient number of adult native <br />fish available to produce larvae. A final hypothesis for lack of small-bodied native fish response <br />to bass removal in the treatment reach was compensatory increases in small bass survival <br />because of large bass removal. However, this hypothesis is not supported by capture rates of <br />age-0 smallmouth bass in control and treatment areas because capture rates in control areas are <br />as high or higher than those in the treatment reaches in each year. We recommend continued <br />sampling as currently conducted to monitor response of native fishes. More extensive and <br />intensive predator removal and changes in environmental conditions may yield insights into <br />native fish response. We also recommend investigating whether abundance levels of adult native <br />fishes are sufficient to produce enough larvae to elicit a response to predator removal and discuss <br />means to accomplish that. Additional investigations of early life history of smallmouth bass may <br />assist with efforts to reduce their survival and recruitment. <br />iv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.