Laserfiche WebLink
isolated pools are not desirable habitat for smallmouth bass. Regardless, fish composition data <br />from isolated pools supports the notion that native fish can survive in the areas with limited bass <br />abundance, but in areas where smallmouth bass are abundant such as in main channels, native <br />fishes do not persist. <br />Yampa River age-0 smallmouth bass age and growth.-smallmouth bass sagittal otolith <br />daily increments were obvious and generally easy to read, a trait that was enhanced by the large <br />size of the otolith relative to cypriniform fishes. Limited smallmouth bass hatching in the <br />Yampa River in 2005 began in mid-June and extended into late July, but the bulk of fish hatched <br />from early to mid-July in about a 2-3 week period (Fig. 9). Regular spawning (about 5-8 d <br />incubation time prior to hatching, depending on water temperature) began when water <br />temperatures were consistently above about 16°C. <br />Smallmouth bass growth was water temperature dependent and typically very fast, even <br />when water temperatures were cooler (Fig. 10). For example, fish collected in mid-August grew <br />on average about 1.2 mm/d at those warm water temperatures. Even fish collected in late <br />September, which experienced a warm summer and a cooler September period, grew at a rate of <br />about 0.7 mm/day. These are very high growth rates, compared to native cypriniform fishes. <br />For example, mean growth rates of Colorado pikeminnow larvae in laboratory studies and in <br />backwaters of the Green River grew from 0.3-0.5 mm/day, under high growth conditions <br />(Bestgen 1996, Bestgen et al. 2006a). Growth rates of razorback suckers are even lower (Bundy <br />and Bestgen 2001). <br />Yampa River smallmouth bass hatching and growth rate information is specific to only <br />2005. This is especially true since we only examined a relatively small sample and because the <br />thermal and flow regime of the Yampa River in 2005 was quite different than in other years in <br />the recent period (see earlier figures). However, results of preliminary studies presented here <br />showed that otolith information may be useful to identify the timing and duration of smallmouth <br />bass spawning seasons in Upper Colorado River Basin streams. Collection of such data under a <br />variety of flow and temperature regimes, including using data from historical bass samples, may <br />be useful to be able to predict timing and intensity of spawning. This information will be useful <br />18 <br />