My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9555
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9555
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:28:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9555
Author
Bestgen, K. R., C. D. Walford, A. A. Hill and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Native Fish Response to Removal of Non-native Predator Fish in the Yampa River, Colorado.
USFW Year
2007.
USFW - Doc Type
140,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
smallmouth bass from 1999 to 2001, and the decline in native fish in the <br />be related. <br />Other elements of the non-native fish community also changed <br />In 1981-1982, redside shiners comprised about 50% of fish captured in all sar <br />minnows an additional 10-20%. Sand shiners were relatively rare, at 5% or le <br />community. In 2003-2006, redside shiners were rare (0.3%) and sand shiners <br />most abundant species (28.6%); fathead minnow remained relatively commo <br />period, may also <br />i the two periods. <br />pies, and fathead <br />;s of the fish <br />were the second- <br />(7%). Shifts in <br />species composition of shiners may be related to shifts in water temperatures, which were <br />warmer in the study area in the 2003-2006 period than historically occurred. eside shiners are <br />generally a more cool-water tolerant species occurring upstream in higher ati <br />shiners are more common in downstream reaches with warmer water. Warn <br />years may be responsible for declines in redside shiner and increased abund~ <br />Anderson (2002) also noted reduced abundance of redside shiner and increa; <br />sand shiner in samples collected in 1999 and 2001 in the same area. This up <br />abundance pattern shift is repeated in the Green River where redside shiners <br />in cooler upstream reaches of Browns Park and upper Lodore Canyon and s~ <br />abundant in the warmer reaches of lower Lodore Canyon and Whirlpool Cai <br />Crist 2000; Bestgen et al. 2006b). <br />e and sand <br />water m recent <br />of sand shiner. <br />abundance of <br />am-downstream <br />re more abundant <br />shiner is more <br />i (Bestgen and <br />Yampa River fishes, control-treatment reach comparisons.-In the fir t two years of <br />smallmouth bass removals, 2003 and 2004, a relatively small proportion of b ss were removed, <br />and all fish removed were age-1 or older (Hawkins 2005, 2006). For exampl , in 2003 <br />smallmouth bass were removed on only one of six electrofishing passes, with a total of 294 bass <br />removed, or about 11 % of the estimated population (estimated abundance of bout 2500 fish > <br />150 mm TL). In 2004, abundance of smallmouth bass > 150 mm TL in the tr atment reach of <br />the study area was estimated at 1,325 (CV = 30%); 1600 smallmouth bass of 11 sizes were <br />handled in the treatment reach in 2004 and 919 of those were > 150 mm TL a d were removed. <br />Thus, the 2004 removal rate was about 69% for that size group. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.