My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8182
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:27:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8182
Author
Bestgen, K. R. and L. W. Crist.
Title
Response of the Green River Fish Community to Construction and Re-regulation of Flaming Gorge Dam. 1962-1996\
USFW Year
2000.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
abundant in reaches 3 and 4, where all pike and most pikeminnow were found. In upstream <br />reaches 1 and 2 of Lodore Canyon, where mostly larger prey were found, all Colorado <br />pikeminnow captured or sighted were 614 to 780 mm TL. Thus, size-structure of potential prey <br />items and their habitat may affect the distribution and sizes of piscivorous fishes, particularly <br />Colorado pikeminnow, in the Lodore Canyon reach of the Green River. <br />Fish of any species and life stage were rare in deep, slow runs with sand substrate, <br />presumably because they lacked substrate to support algal and invertebrate communities. This <br />was particularly true in lower Browns Park, where substrate was almost exclusively shifting <br />sand. Limited sampling in that reach suggested that the few brown trout and juvenile white <br />suckers captured were associated with deep undercut banks and woody debris. Native <br />catostomids were few and associated almost exclusively with scarce patches of cobble or waste <br />concrete eroded from bank rip-rap. <br />We feel reasonably confident that electrofishing sampling detected nearly all of the <br />species in the main channel of the Green River in Lodore Canyon. Electrofishing was also a <br />much better technique to detect the presence of relatively rare, large-bodied species such as <br />Colorado pikeminnow and northern pike, compared to seining, which detected none of those <br />taxa. With the exception of the few large eddies and pools greater than 3 m deep, electrofishing <br />effectively sampled most of the habitat where Colorado pikeminnow were likely to occur. In <br />contrast, our ability to effectively estimate the distribution and abundance of channel catfish by <br />electrofishing was poor. We know this because channel catfish were rare in electrofishing <br />samples in reaches 2 and 3 of Lodore Canyon but could be readily captured by angling. <br />The diversity and abundance of hybrid suckers we encountered in this study was <br />unexpected. Increased rates of hybridization maybe due in large part to relatively recent <br />expansion of white suckers into the Green River upstream of the Yampa River. A single <br />specimen ofthat-species was detected in a rotenone sample taken in September 1957 in the <br />Green River in Browns Park, along with speckled dace, roundtail chub, flannelmouth sucker and <br />a single chub tentatively identified as a bonytail (Nolting 1957). White sucker was not detected <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.