My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8182
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:27:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8182
Author
Bestgen, K. R. and L. W. Crist.
Title
Response of the Green River Fish Community to Construction and Re-regulation of Flaming Gorge Dam. 1962-1996\
USFW Year
2000.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br />A usual consequence of river regulation by main stem dams is reduction of native species <br />diversity (Holden 1979, Ward and Stanford 1979, Stanford et al. 1996). Such reductions <br />typically result from loss of habitat, blocked migration routes, or alteration of natural ecosystem <br />attributes and functioning. For example, in streams of the western USA, dams reduce springtime <br />discharge maxima from snow melt so that main-channel and floodplain interaction is reduced or <br />eliminated. Deep-releases from reservoirs reduce spring and summer water temperature of <br />streams downstream of dams and cause shifts in composition offish and invertebrate <br />communities from warm stenothennic native species to non-indigenous cold-tolerant eurytherms. <br />Remnant populations of native fishes may persist as adults in highly regulated reaches if they are <br />long-lived and have high dispersal capability, but reproduction is often reduced or eliminated by <br />cold spring and summer water temperatures. Non-indigenous species, which are often supported <br />by dam-created habitat or a reservoir source population, are another mechanism for reduction of <br />native species. Such reductions may manifest through negative effects of predation, competition, <br />or introduction of diseases and parasites. Effects of introduced fishes maybe especially <br />problematic in western USA river systems because indigenous communities have naturally low <br />diversity and may be prone to invasion (Minckley and Deacon 1968, Stanford and Ward 1-986, <br />Moyle et al. 1986, Carlson and Muth 1989, Minckley and Deacon 1991). <br />A protocol for restoration of regulated rivers (Stanford et al. 1996) that was derived from <br />principles of lotic ecology calls for re-establishment of intra- and inter-annual habitat linkages <br />along lateral, vertical, and longitudinal stream axes by restoring more natural flow, sediment, and <br />temperature regimes (Ward 1989, Petts 1984, Ward and Stanford 1995, Poff et al. 1997). <br />Examples of key processes that may facilitate recovery of biota are re-establishment of annual <br />flow maxima to maintain channel geomorphology and flood plain connectedness, reduction of <br />baseflow fluctuations to enhance stability and food web functioning of low velocity nearshore <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.