My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9443
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:27:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9443
Author
Bestgen, K. R., G. B. Haines, R. Brunson, T. Chart, M. Trammell, R. T. Muth, G. Birchell, K. Chrisopherson and J. M. Bundy.
Title
Status of Wild Razorback Sucker in the Green River Basin, Utah and Colorado, Determined From Basinwide Monitoring and Other Sampling Programs.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Project Number 22D,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Endangered razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus was once widespread and abundant <br /> <br />1 <br />throughout the Colorado River Basin but is now rare (Minckley 1983, Bestgen 1990, Minckley et <br />al. 1991). Concentrations occur in lakes Mohave and Mead, Arizona and Nevada, and in the <br />middle Green River, Utah but elsewhere occur only as scattered individuals (Minckley 1983, <br />Tyus 1987, Bestgen 1990, Minckley et al. 1991, Modde et al. 1996, Holden et al. 2001•). Wild <br />fish in Lake Mohave have declined in abundance to about 4,000 individuals in 2001 (Minckley et <br />al. 1991, Marsh 1994, G. Mueller pers. comm.). Abundance of adult Green River razorback <br />suckers was estimated at about 300 to 950 during the 1980 to 1992 period (Lanigan and Tyus <br />1989, Modde et al. 1996), but the present status of that population is unknown. Wild populations <br />of razorback suckers are dominated by large, old individuals, and recruitment rates everywhere <br />are thought low ornon-existent (Minckley 1983, Minckley et al. 1991, Tyus 1987, Modde et al. <br />1996). <br />Decline of razorback suckers has been attributed to alterations of physical habitat and <br /> <br />negative effects of introduced fishes. Mainstem dams alter flow patterns, water temperature, and <br />sediment loads and also serve as barriers to upstream fish movement (Carlson and Muth 1989). <br />In the upper Colorado River Basin, flow reduction due to storage of spring runoff, and effects of <br />channelization and levee placement, reduce frequency and duration of flood plain inundation. A <br />decrease in warm, food-rich flood plain areas, which are likely important as rearing and resting <br />habitat for early and life adult stages ofspring-spawning razorback suckers, may limit <br />recruitment (Modde et al. 1996). Predation on early life stages of razorback suckers, combined <br />with slow growth, is also thought a primary factor limiting recruitment (Minckley et al. 1991). <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.