My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9443
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:27:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9443
Author
Bestgen, K. R., G. B. Haines, R. Brunson, T. Chart, M. Trammell, R. T. Muth, G. Birchell, K. Chrisopherson and J. M. Bundy.
Title
Status of Wild Razorback Sucker in the Green River Basin, Utah and Colorado, Determined From Basinwide Monitoring and Other Sampling Programs.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Project Number 22D,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />All adult fish captured were weighed and measured, and scanned for the presence of a <br />passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag or examined for presence of a carlin dangler tag. <br />Beginning in 1990, fish captured that were tagged with carlin tags were re-tagged with PIT tags <br />and the former tag type was removed (pers. comm. C. McAda). Data were reported to the <br />centralized database manager for archiving. <br />Fish sampling, larvae.-Light traps were used as the primary sampling gear during <br />Baisnwide monitoring because sampling during 1992 to 1995 (Muth 1995) demonstrated that <br />light traps were a more effective means of sampling early life stages of razorback suckers from <br />low-velocity areas than other gears. During 1996 to 1999, light-trap sampling for early life <br />stages of razorback suckers occurred in the same reaches as adult sampling, but effort was <br />distributed differently. Light-trap sampling localities for the middle and lower Green River <br />reaches are listed in Appendix I and II, respectively. Only a few samples were collected in the <br />lower Yampa River in 1996 and 1998, but none were collected in 1997 or 1999. Sampling in the <br />middle Green River occurred in all three main reaches but was concentrated near the Escalante <br />Ranch spawning area (e.g., Cliff Creek) in most years, and secondarily near downstream Old <br />Charlie Wash and Ouray National Wildlife Refuge (e.g., Greasewood Corral). In general, <br />sampling became more focused on areas where suitable low-velocity habitat was available each <br />year and throughout the season regardless of flow level. In the lower Green River, sampling for <br />larvae was concentrated in Labyrinth Canyon near Millard Canyon, Anderson Bottom, Holeman <br />Canyon, and Stillwater Canyon, and near the mouth of the San Rafael River. Light-trap sampling <br />was also conducted in the Green River Valley. These were many of the same places that were <br />sampled in previous work from 1993 to 1995 (Muth 1995). Flooded tributary mouths and <br />washes, large backwaters, and other low-velocity channel-margin areas were primary sampling <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.