Laserfiche WebLink
suckers radiotagged in the mainstream Colorado River near Grand <br />Junction in spring 1987 showed some movement (Osmundson and <br />Kaeding 1989a). Two of these fish moved downstream 17.1 and 19.2 <br />km, respectively, and stayed there the remainder of the year while <br />a third moved upstream 11.2 km from its release site within about <br />a 3-week period and subsequently moved downstream to near its <br />release site. <br />Telemetry information for razorback suckers was also <br />collected in the Gila River, near Safford, Arizona (Marsh and <br />Minckley 1989c). Fourteen wild (Lake Mohave) and hatchery-reared <br />adults were implanted and released 24 May 1988, and nine more were <br />implanted, held for-recovery, and later released on 12 October <br />1988. Movements of fish were mostly downstream; only three fish <br />moved upstream. Most were thought to have died in a short time <br />(32 days or less) as indicated by recovery of transmitters near <br />fish remains. Some fish may have moved downstream to San Carlos <br />Reservoir where transmitter signals were undetectable in deeper <br />water (Marsh and Minckley 1989c). <br />In winter, razorback suckers in the Green River remained <br />within 5 km study sections and exhibited no distinct diel pattern <br />of movement (Valdez and Masslich 1989)._ Local movements occurred <br />between closely-spaced microhabitats, but fish often remained <br />sedentary for several hours within a microhabitat. <br />Movements of razorback suckers in Lake Mohave were evaluated <br />with mark and recapture data (Marsh and Minckley 1989a). Of <br />twenty-five fish recaptured two to seven years after tagging <br />33 <br />