Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />stained by debris pigments. This protocol recovered 100% of a known number of larvae (range <br />9-10) from five experimental samples. <br />Laboratory procedures. --Colorado squawfish larvae (< 20 mm TL) captured in drift nets <br />were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm TL. Ages of selected specimens collected in 1990-1992 <br />were estimated by counting daily increments in otoliths. Counts of otolith increments, which <br />were first formed at hatching, were estimated two to four separate times in the left sagitta or <br />lapillus and averaged (see Bestgen and Bundy [ 1998]), for details on aging techniques). Otoliths <br />from all but 9 of 2537 fish sampled in 1991-1992 were readable. Laboratory studies showed that <br />ages of Colorado squawfish reared in fluctuating temperatures of 18, 22 and 26°C for up to 165 d <br />post hatching were estimated without bias (Bestgen acid Bundy 1998). Therefore, age <br />underestimation of wild fish was discounted as a source of error. <br />Initiation of reproduction was estimated by subtracting the average age of larvae at <br />capture (6 d, Bestgen 1997) and average incubation time of fertilized eggs at 18°C (6 d, Bestgen <br />and Williams 1994) from the date that larvae were first captured in drift nets set in the lower <br />Yampa River and the lower Green River. Date of cessation of reproduction was similarly <br />estimated by subtracting 12 d from the date that the last larvae were captured at each sampling <br />site. The first peak in reproductive activity was qualitatively determined by subtracting 12 d <br />from the first substantial increase in capture of larvae in drift nets. Most temperature data for the <br />Yampa River from 1990-1996 were recorded just upstream of the Green River with a <br />continuously recording thermograph (G. Smith, pers. comm., U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, <br />Denver, Colorado). Lower Yampa River data were estimated in 1993 and 1994 by adding 2.1 °C <br />to temperature measurements from an upstream gauge at Government Bridge upstream of <br />Maybell, Colorado. That value was the average difference between the two stations in the month <br />of June in 1991, 1992, 1995, and 1996. Degree-day accumulation in the lower Yampa River was <br />estimated from temperature data collected near Jensen, Utah because this was the most <br />geographically proximate gauge with a full year of records. Most lower Green River temperature <br />data were estimated by adding 2.3°C to temperature measurements from an upstream gauge at the <br />Ouray National Wildlife Refuge (G. Smith, pers. comm.). That value was the average difference <br />between the two stations in the month of June in 1992. All 1991 and 1995 temperature data and <br />degree-day accumulation data for all years were from instantaneous records collected by the U.S. <br />Geological Survey near the town of Green River, Utah. In general, we avoided use of data <br />6 <br />