Laserfiche WebLink
42.5 h), suggesting that once hatching began at any temperature, times to midpoint and <br />end of hatching were about equal across all temperatures. In general, swim bladder <br />inflation and first feeding occurred sooner at higher temperatures and also at fluctuating <br />temperatures. <br />Lengths oflarvae.--Length at hatch (Table 1) differed significantly for <br />temperature level but not for regime, or interaction (Table 2). Lengths were significantly <br />different in 18 and 26°C treatments, but not in the 22 and 26°C or 18 and 22°C treatments. <br />Lengths at d 7 differed significantly for regime and interaction but not for temperature <br />level. Most interaction significance was due to faster growth in the fluctuating regime at <br />22°C. <br />Discussion <br />Hatch and survival.--Results presented here generally corroborate those of <br />previous laboratory studies. I also found hatch and larval survival were generally higher <br />over a wider range of temperature conditions than previously reported. This may reflect <br />the low density of embryos and the rapid exchange of water in our incubation chambers <br />which minimized fungal infection and oxygen deprivation. Differences in hatch and <br />survival at 18-26°C and 30°C may partly reflect the fact that these treatments were done <br />in different years with embryos from different broodfish. <br />High hatch and survival of larvae were observed in all treatments except 30°C, a <br />temperature rarely recorded in river channels in the upper Colorado River basin. Summer <br />water temperatures of 30°C were found in the former range of Colorado squawfish in the <br />lower Colorado River (Dill 1944). However, it is likely that Colorado squawfish there <br />15 <br />