Laserfiche WebLink
subject to minimum flow levels; and 4) with proper compensation, preparing and <br />executing contracts and subordinating diversions associated with approved and <br />perfected rights. Although current Utah water law may not fully provide for all <br />aspects of instream flow protection, Utah does believe they can provide an <br />adequate level of protection. <br />After examining the available flow protection approaches, it appears the most <br />common strategy will be to condition the approval of presently filed and new <br />applications, making them subject to predetermined streamflow levels. To <br />accomplish this, the State Engineer would add a conditi~,n of approval to water <br />right applications iwithin the area) filed after the policy is adopted. The condition <br />would state that whenever the flow of the Green River (or other stream) drops <br />below the predetermined streamflow level, then diversions associated with water <br />rights approved after such condition was imposed would be prohibited. Based on <br />past legal challenges to the State's authority to impose conditions associated with <br />new approvals, it would appear that this is within the authority of the State <br />Engineer. This approach will not specifically recognize an instream flow right; <br />however, it will protect the flows from being diverted and used by subsequently <br />approved water rights. This strategy of conditioning the approval of presently filed <br />and new applications also could be combined with the others listed above and with <br />appropriately contracted reservoir reoperations. . <br />Implementing this approach will require that the State Engineer conduct public <br />hearings to present the proposed streamflow levels to the public and water users. <br />At the hearing, comments would be taken about the proposal and time would be <br />allowed to submit written comments. After reviewing the information presented <br />and any additional investigation deemed necessary, the State Engineer then would <br />determine if such flow protection is in the public interest. If so, a policy would be <br />developed requiring presently filed and new applications to be approved subject to <br />accepted flow recommendations (currently summer and fall flows in the Green <br />River). As additional flow recommendations are finalized and accepted (e.g. winter <br />and spring flows in the Green River), the policy would be applied to address these <br />flows. <br />2.2 II. RESTORE HABITAT <br />Important elements of habitat protection include restoring and managing in-channel <br />habitat and historically flooded bottomland areas, restoring passage to historically- <br />occupied river reaches, enhancing water temperatures, and reducing or eliminating <br />the impacts of contaminants. <br />Historically, upper Colorado River basin floodplains were frequently inundated by <br />spring runoff, but today much of the river is channelized by levees, dikes, rip-rap, <br />and tamarisk. Fish access to these flooded bottomlands has been further reduced <br />by decreased peak spring flows due to upstream impoundments. Numerous <br />studies have suggested the importance of seasonal flooding to river productivity, <br />7 <br />