My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9305
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:25:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9305
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Final Biological Opinion for the Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam.
USFW Year
1992.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
13 <br />variable between years during the optimum spawning period, but average <br />temperatures ranged from about 22-25 °C (Tyus 1990). Others reported a peak <br />in spawning after temperatures reach 20 °C (Haynes et al. 1984; Hamman 1982a; <br />Holden and Stalnaker 1975; Tyus and McAda 1984). Spawning, both in the <br />hatchery and in the wild, generally occurs from July-August but may extend <br />into early August depending on flows and temperature. <br />Vanicek and Kramer (1969) first suggested that discharge ,and temperature <br />influenced spawning in Colorado squawfish. Data from 1981 to 1988 indicated <br />that spawning occurred during the period of declining flows following spring <br />peak runoff and increasing temperatures (Tyus 1990). This generally occurred <br />about 26 days (range: 11-33 days) following migration. Peak discharge <br />preceding spawn, and mean minimum temperatures during spawn were highly <br />correlated with the spawning period, ostensibly because discharge, <br />temperature, and the spawning period are correlated. Spawning of Colorado <br />squawfish is considered a result of complex environmental and biological <br />influences and is not triggered by a single flow or temperature event (Tyus <br />1990). As an example, flow spikes from rainstorms during spring runoff may <br />also influence ovulation and spawning in Colorado squawfish, as recently <br />hypothesized by Nesler et al. (1988). Radio-tracking data suggest that all <br />adult Colorado squawfish do not spawn each year, and male and female fish may <br />require different stimuli for gonadal maturation (Tyus 1990), some of which <br />appear to be flow related. <br />Breeding adults were most often concentrated in river reaches containing deep <br />pools, eddies, and submerged cobble/boulder bars. Radio-tagged fish moved <br />from pools or eddies to presumably spawn on bars and then returned to the <br />former habitat (Tyus et al. 1987), behavior similar to that of spawning <br />northern squawfish (Beamesderfer and Congleton 1981). Turbid riverine <br />conditions precluded direct observations of a de osition• <br />removed from the substrate during this time ofgyear are cleaneof sedbment and <br />algae (Archer and Tyus 1984; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, unpublished <br />data). There is substantial field and laboratory data showing that Colorado <br />squawfish and other squawfish species require cleaned cobble surfaces for <br />successful egg adhesion (Burns 1966; Patten and Rodman 1969; Hamman 1981b). <br />Hamman (1981b) also noted hatching of Colorado squawfish larvae from cobble <br />surfaces. The need for cleaned cobble and boulder substrates is supported by <br />spawning of Colorado squawfish following peak flows and peak sediment <br />transport (Tyus and Karp 1989). Spring scouring, a gradual decrease in summer <br />flow, and a concomitant decrease in sediment load aid in preventing siltation <br />of cobble bars. Thus, magnitude, timing, and duration of spring flows are <br />considered potential limiting factors for successful reproduction by Colorado <br />squawfish. <br />Temperature also affects egg development and hatching. In the laboratory, egg <br />mortality was 100 percent in a controlled test at 13 °C. At 16-18 °C, <br />development of the egg is slightly retarded, but hatching success and survival <br />of larvae were higher. At 20-26 °C, development and survival through the <br />larval stage were up to 59 percent (Hamman 1981b). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.