Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Fewer squawfish are found in the Colorado River. However, occurrence of adult <br />and larval fish has been documented annually since at least 1979 (Valdez <br />et al. 1982b). Recovery of the species in the Colorado subbasin requires the <br />protection of the Colorado River. If stocking proves to be a successful <br />technique, then augmentation of existing populations in the Colorado River may <br />be necessary to provide sufficient numbers of fish for su~:cessful reproduction <br />and effective management. ' <br />Recent studies indicate that the San Juan River contains a small, reproducing <br />population of Colorado squawfish. This river will be especially important if <br />recovery efforts fail on the Colorado or portions of the Green Rivers. <br />Augmentation of existing populations of Colorado squawfish in the San Juan <br />River also may be necessary to provide sufficient numbers of fish for <br />successful reproduction and effective management. <br />Stocking of fish in the San Juan subbasin or in the Green/Upper Colorado <br />subbasin should only be done after the genetics are documented (to determine <br />if a number of genetically separate populations are present) and if it is <br />determined that the current population is not viable. If there are <br />genetically separable populations, then broodstock should be taken from the <br />resident population and young reared for eventual reintroduction into the ' <br />resident reach. However, such stocking should occur only in accordance with <br />an integrated management and restoration plan. <br />The Lower Basin no longer has naturally occurring Colorado squawfish. Much of ' <br />the habitat in the Lower Basin has been sever~:ly altered and contains <br />relatively large populations of introduced fishes. Of the remaining habitat <br />in the Lower Basin, the upper Verde and upper Salt Rivers are most pristine, ' <br />and thus offer the best opportunities for reestablishment of Colorado <br />squawfish. Colorado squawfish in those rivers have been designated <br />nonessential experimental populations (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1985). <br /> <br />In addition, there is an active proposal by the Service to reintroduce ' <br />Colorado squawfish into the mainstem Colorado River between Parker and <br />Imperial dams and designate them a nonessential experimental population. The <br />nonessential experimental designation allows stocked fish to be treated as <br />threatened species. For purposes of Section 7, any experimental population <br />occurring within a National Park or National Wildlife Refuge is treated as <br />threatened. Outside of National Parks or National Wildlife Refuges, any , <br />experimental population is treated as a proposed species for Section 7 <br />purposes. <br />Lower Basin rivers also provide opportunities to conduct valuable research and ' <br />experimentation that may not be feasible or desirable in the Upper Basin. <br />Ongoing stocking and monitoring efforts by Lower Basin researchers could lead <br /> <br />to a better understanding of the habitat requirements, homing behavior, and ' <br />factors limiting Colorado squawfish survival. These activities will add to <br />our understanding of squawfish biology and support recovery efforts throughout <br />the Colorado River basin. , <br /> <br />18 ' <br /> <br />