Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />r <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />In October 1994, the Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and the Fish and Wildlife <br />Service implemented "Interim Stocking Procedures" to see how a process to <br />address differences in stocking positions between agencies might work. During <br />the period covered by the interim procedures, Colorado submitted eight lake <br />management plans for waters in the floodplain. Because all these waters were <br />within the 40-year floodplain, none were approved. Also, as part of the <br />procedures, the Fish and Wildlife Service refuge at Ouray, Utah was not <br />allowed to pump water from Pelican Lake because nonnative fishes were escaping <br />from the refuge into the river. In accordance with the interim procedures, <br />tiger muskie were stocked into Harvey Gap Reservoir, stocking of black crappie <br />and bluegill was approved for McPhee Reservoir, and salmonid stocking <br />continues in numerous locations basinwide. The interim procedures expired <br />December, 1995. However, the States have voluntarily continued to abide by <br />the interim procedures. <br />In April, 1995, an independent scientific review team was convened to review <br />the draft stocking procedures that were being considered at that time. The <br />teams made several major points: 1) nonnative fishes should not be stocked <br />outside of their historic range, especially not into areas designated as <br />critical habitat for the four endangered fish; 2) there is little biological <br />difference between the 10-, 40-, 50-, and 100-year floodplains, nonnative fish <br />will eventually escape into the river from ponds in these areas; and 3) if <br />occurrence of largemouth bass, bluegill, and black crappie are low in the <br />river, then concern over them being stocked in the floodplain may not be a <br />major issue. Additionally, public meetings were held on the procedures <br />December 5, 1995, in Denver, Colorado; December 6, 1995, in Craig, Colorado; <br />December 7, 1995, in Grand Junction, Colorado; and December 12, 1995, in <br />Vernal, Utah. At these meetings, presentations were made regarding the need <br />to implement stocking procedures. Stocking procedures under consideration <br />were also discussed. The primary purpose of the meetings was to get public <br />input concerning regulating warmwater fish stocking in the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin. Approximately 70 people attended one or more of the public <br />meetings. Most people attending has questions regarding the procedures, <br />specific sport fish species, and/or recovery of the endangered fish, but few <br />expressed either support or opposition. <br />The Procedures will be implemented by a Cooperative Agreement among the <br />Service and State fish and wildlife agencies in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. <br />The roles and responsibilities of each agency will be clearly described in the <br />Cooperative Agreement. Both the Service and the States have statutory <br />responsibilities which cannot be abrogated. The States have the <br />responsibility for managing fish and wildlife resources that includes <br />threatened and endangered species occurring within their boundaries. The <br />Service has certain legislated responsibilities for conserving fish and <br />wildlife resources including administration of the Endangered Species Act. <br />The goal of the Service and the States is to reach consensus on issues related <br />to stocking of nonnative fishes so that neither agency has to independently <br />assert its authority. The Service and the States will make a concerted effort <br />to resolve any disagreements that may arise from either public or private <br />stocking proposals. <br /> <br />