Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1 <br />~1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />L <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />Nonnative fish species compete with native fish species in several ways. <br />Physical factors in the environment regulate the capacity of a <br />particular area to support aquatic life. Suitable habitat and food <br />resources are the primary limiting factors. Because the amount of <br />physical habitat available is finite, increasing the number of species <br />present in the habitat usually equates to smaller populations of most <br />species. The size of each species population in the system is <br />controlled by the ability of each life stage to compete for habitat and <br />food resources. The species better adapted to the physical features of <br />the habitat would likely be a better competitor against less well <br />adapted species, and thus have larger populations. Native species were <br />well adapted to conditions in the basin prior to development, however, <br />under current altered conditions nonnative fishes are quite competitive <br />and viable. <br />C. Federal Action: This Environmental Assessment (EA) is being developed <br />under the implementing regulations of the National Environmental Policy <br />Act (NEPA). The Federal action is the participation of the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service (Service) in a Cooperative Agreement that allows <br />routine stocking of nonnative fishes in situations that was be <br />determined through the NEPA and section 7 process. <br />D. Area to be Covered by Stocking Procedures: The selected stocking <br />procedures alternative will be presented to the wildlife commissions for <br />action, as appropriate, for the States of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. <br />The procedures are intended to cover the Upper Colorado River Basin, <br />excluding the San Juan River drainage, which includes the Colorado River <br />and all its tributaries (Figure 1). <br />II. BACKGROUND <br />The purpose of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, is to provide a means to <br />conserve the ecosystems upon which endangered and threatened species depend, <br />and to provide a program for the conservation of listed species. Under <br />authority of the Endangered Species Act, the Recovery Implementation Program <br />for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin (Recovery <br />Program) was formalized in January 1988. Signatories to this Recovery Program <br />were the Governors of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming; the Secretary of the <br />Interior; and the Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration. The <br />purpose of the Recovery Program is to recover the endangered fishes while <br />providing for existing and new water development to proceed in the Upper Basin <br />in compliance with the Endangered Species Act. The Recovery Program is also <br />to serve as a reasonable and prudent alternative to avoid the likelihood of <br />jeopardy to the continued existence of the endangered fishes and to avoid the <br />destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat in section 7 <br />consultations on water depletion impacts related to historic and new projects. <br />The five principal elements of the Recovery Program are: 1) habitat <br />management, 2) habitat development and maintenance, 3) native fish stocking, <br />4) nonnative species and sport fishing, and 5) research, data management, and <br />monitoring {Fish and Wildlife Service 1987}. The stocking procedures being <br />developed address number 4 above by implementing guidelines to reduce or <br />eliminate impacts from nonnative fishes. <br />3 <br />1 <br />