My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9313 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9313 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9313
Author
Burdick, B. D., J. Flair, M. Lloyd and B. Scheer.
Title
Native and Nonnative Fish Use of Two Gravel-Pit Ponds Connected to the Upper Colorado River at 29-5/8 Road Near Grand Junction, Colorado.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Project number CAP-6-GP,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
40 <br />serve as a reasonable and prudent alternative to avoid jeopardy. The RIP RAP <br />was finalized on October 15. 1993, and has been reviewed and updated annually. <br />In accordance witi~ the agreement, the Service assesses the impacts of project <br />that require section 7 consultation and determines if progress toward recovery <br />has been sufficient for the RIP to serve as a reasonable and prudent ~. <br />alternative. If sufficient progress is being achieved, biological opinions are <br />written to identify activities and accomplishments of the RIP that support it <br />as a reasonable and prudent alternative. If sufficient progress towards the <br />recovery of the endangered fishes has not been achieved by the RIP, actions <br />from the RIP RAP are identified which must be completed to avoid jeopardy to <br />the fishes. For historic projects, these actions serve as the reasonable and <br />prudent alternative as long as they are completed according to the schedule <br />identified in the IZIP RAP. For new projects, these actions serve as the <br />reasonable and prudent alternative as long as they are completed before the <br />impact of the project occurs. <br />In determining if sufficient progress has been achieved, the Service considers <br />(a) actions which result in a measurable population response, a measurable <br />improvement in habitat for the fishes, legal protection of flows needed foi~ <br />recovery, or a reduction in the threat of immediate extinction; (b) status of <br />fish populations; (c) adequacy of flows; and (d) magnitude of the project <br />impact. In addition, the Service considers support activities (funding, <br />research, information, and education,- etc.) of the RIP if they help achieve a <br />measurable population response, a measurable improvement in habitat for the <br />fishes, legal protection of flows needed for recovery, or a reduction in the <br />threat of immediate extinction. The Service evaluates progress separately for <br />the .Colorado River and the Green River sub-basins; however, it gives due <br />consideration to progress throughout the Upper Basin in evaluating progress <br />towards recovery. <br />This basin wide consultation examines both historic and ne~/Federal;projects, <br />as well as existing State and private projects totaling 5'8,000 acre-feet of <br />depletions to the Duchesne and Green rivers. The Service has determined that, <br />as of this date, the RIP has made sufficient progress towards recovery of the <br />fishes to serve as the reasonable and prudent alternatives to avoid jeopardy, <br />for projects with an average annual depletion of < 3.000 acre-feet. The <br />purpose of these reasonable and prudent alternative elements is to avoid <br />jeopardy to listed species and destruction or adverse modification of their <br />critical habitats while also providing reasonable assurance that water <br />projects, both new and historic, can continue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.