My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8215
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:23:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8215
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Final Environmental Assessment
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Management and Control of Noonative Fish Species in Floodplain Ponds of the Upper Colorado and Gunnison Rivers.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I. PURPOSE AND NEED <br />A. General. The Colorado River and its tributaries provide water for municipal <br />use, irrigated agriculture, industry, and mining (Bishop 1971). Bishop <br />emphasizes that these various uses of water have resulted in conflicts. <br />Water development in the Upper Colorado River Basin altered the natural <br />river ecosystem (Miller et al. 1982; Wydoski 1980). Dam construction and <br />storage of water to serve human needs changed the natural hydrograph through <br />dam operations that released water for the irrigation season (Johnson 1974) <br />or for generating power during peak use periods. Changes in the hydrograph <br />have, in turn, altered aquatic habitats, particularly backwater and <br />floodplain habitats that are vital to the early life stages of native <br />fishes. Coldwater releases from dams have reduced water temperatures of the <br />natural and historic warmwater aquatic ecosystem. Water quality has been -- <br />impacted from toxic heavy metals through mining activities and from <br />increased selenium concentrations through irrigated agriculture. Nonnative ___ <br />fish species were introduced in the rivers and manmade reservoirs, both <br />intentional and accidental introductions of nonnative fish species have <br />changed the composition of the natural fish community. <br />Human alteration of the Upper Colorado River Basin (Figure 1} has resulted <br />in four endemic fishes (razorback sucker, Xvrauchen texanus; bonytail, Gila <br />elegans; humpback chub, Gila cypha; and Colorado squawfish, Ptychocheilus <br />Lucius) being listed as "endangered" under the Endangered Species Act. <br />Although numerous factors have contributed to listing these native fishes <br />as endangered, several factors appear to be particularly important. Habitat <br />alteration and introduction of nonnative fish species were considered to be <br />the most important factors in the extinction of 40 native North American <br />fishes (27 species and 13 subspecies) during the past century (Miller et al. <br />1989). These two factors undoubtedly contributed to the demise of the <br />endangered Colorado River fishes. <br />B. Purpose. Endangered fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin have been and <br />continue to be impacted by a number of factors including water depletions, <br />disrupted natural hydrograph through the operation of dams for irrigation <br />and hydro-power, losses of riverine backwaters and floodplain habitat, <br />barriers to native fish migration, and predation by and competition from <br />nonnative fish species. Various recovery actions have been taken to resolve <br />water depletions, streamflow patterns, migration barriers to fish by dams, <br />and rehabilitation or restoration of floodplain habitat. The American <br />public has become more concerned about adverse environmental impacts (McEvoy <br />1973) and actions-are being taken to protect environments or restore those <br />that have been adversely affected by humans. <br />In 1996, the Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fishes in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin (Recovery Program) developed a strategic plan to <br />control nonnative fish species. Recovery Program participants, representing <br />various interests, were directly involved in the development of the <br />strategic plan to control nonnative fish species that is summarized by Tyus <br />and Saunders (1996). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.