Laserfiche WebLink
on ponds where landowners will cooperate in this recovery effort. Costs of <br />screening the ponds will be borne by the Recovery Program or the U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service. <br />This alternative will provide only a partial solution to the chronic <br />escapement of nonnative fishes from floodplain ponds. Although this <br />preventive measure will be part of the Recovery Program effort to control <br />the chronic escapement of nonnative fish species, it will not become a <br />largescale effort under the Recovery Program. <br />No impacts are expected on vegetation and land use, Indian trust assets, or <br />environmental justice under this alternative. <br />Fish and Wildlife Resources. Nonnative fishes would be retained in <br />floodplain ponds to provide food for piscivorous birds and sportfishing. <br />Wildlife species would not be impacted. - <br />Endangered Species. Chronic escapement of nonnative fishes into the Upper <br />Colorado and Gunnison rivers would cease, reducing predation upon or <br />competition with the endangered Colorado River fishes. <br />Socio-Economic Factors. Mechanical control devices ,would be installed on <br />the outlets of floodplain ponds only with the consent and cooperation of the <br />landowner. Therefore, no adverse sociological impacts will occur under this <br />alternative. <br />Some economy would be provided to the project area for installation of the <br />structures. The cost associated with the installation of mechanical control <br />devices on the outlets of floodplain ponds would be covered through the <br />Recovery Program. Therefore, no adverse economic impacts will occur and, <br />in fact, some local economy would be generated from this Recovery Program <br />effort. <br />D. Alternative 4 - Slope the Bottom of Ponds in the Floodplain and Reconnect <br />the Ponds with the Rivers. Under this alternative, floodplain ponds would <br />be reconnected to either the Colorado River or the Gunnison River if the <br />bottoms cowl d be sloped so that they drai n i nto the river as the streamfl ows <br />subside. Since the floodplain of both the Colorado and Gunnison rivers has <br />been mined rather extensively for gravel, this area contains numerous <br />gravel-pit ponds that could be connected with the river. Only select <br />gravel-pit ponds would be suitable for reconnection with the rivers. Many <br />of the gravel pits are deep -- below the deepest parts of the rivers. Such <br />ponds may allow nonnative fish species to flourish that would be <br />counterproductive to recovery of the endangered fishes. <br />By connecting select floodplain ponds with the river, embayments would be <br />created that could control reproduction of nonnative fishes while, at the <br />same time, they would likely benefit the endangered species. The declining <br />numbers of the endangered Colorado River fishes is attributed to the lack <br />of recruitment due to low survival from predation and competition by <br />nonnative fishes and possibly starvation during the critical early life <br />stages. It is believed that the high zooplankton productivity would <br />23 <br />