Laserfiche WebLink
<br />30 <br />20 <br />10 <br />0 <br />X <br />w <br />~ 6 <br />Z <br />U <br />~= 4 <br />Q <br />O 2 <br />O <br />~ 0 <br />Q <br />Z <br />~ 30 <br />20 <br />SPAWNING OF HUMPBACK AND ROUNDTAIL CHUBS <br />FEMALE <br />ROUNDTAIL <br />CHUB <br />5 <br />_~ <br /> <br />4 <br />~ 6 3 ~ 2 <br /> ~ - - - - <br />- MALE <br />_ ROUNDTAIL <br />CHUB <br />_ 12 5 <br />- 4 11 <br />-~ ~ ~ <br />- FEMALE <br />_ HUMPBACK <br />CHUB <br />10 <br />0 <br />10 - <br />13 14 10 - <br />1 4 g 5 - <br />2- <br />3 <br /> 3 19 <br /> 10 13 5 9 <br /> 3 <br />2 <br />2 <br />2 2 <br />m <br />139 <br />AriliL nnAY JUNE JULY <br />MONTH <br />FIGURE 3. -Seasonal changes in the gonadosomatic index (100 x gonad weight whole-body weight) for male and <br />female roundtail chub of mature size in the Colorado River at Black Rocks, Colorado, 1983 and 1984, and for <br />female humpback chub in 1983. Means (crosses), standard error of means (vertical boxes), ranges (vertical lines), <br />and sample sizes (numbers} aze given. <br />correlated with the occurrence of expressible ova <br />in both species (Figures 2, 3). The index of female <br />roundtail chub increased during early June and <br />decreased as spawning progressed in July (Figure <br />3). The pattern of seasonal change in the gonad- <br />osomatic index of the male roundtail chub was <br />generally like that of females. Female humpback <br />chub were examined internally beginning in early <br />July 1983, when their external characteristics sug- <br />gested that spawning might be occurring. Their <br />indices declined as spawning occurred during the <br />subsequent 3 weeks (Figure 3). <br />The fish spawned when river discharge was near <br />its seasonal high or was receding, and when river <br />temperatures were 14-24°C (Figure 4). Relatively <br />high seasonal runoff flows (two of the highest on <br />record) in 1983 and 1984 delayed the seasonal <br />warming of the Colorado River (compare to Val- <br />dez and Clemmer 1982). <br />Fish Movement <br />We implanted 33 humpback chub and 17 <br />roundtail chub with radio transmitters; for each <br />of these fish, the principal component analysis <br />supported the taxonomic classification made in <br />the field. We found no differences in movement <br />either between sexes or among years within species. <br />Humpback chub moved relatively little from Black <br />Rocks and had a mean maximum displacement <br />of 1.4 km from the release site; in contrast, round- <br />tail chub moved extensively and had a mean max- <br />imum displacement of 33.9 km (Table 3). During <br />