My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9663
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9663
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:48 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9663
Author
Johnson, B. M. and e. al.
Title
Ranking Predatory Threats by Nonnative Fishes in the Yampa River, Colorado, via Bioenergetics Modeling
USFW Year
2008
USFW - Doc Type
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1942 <br />JOHNSON ET AL. <br />and Minckley 1991; Olden et al. 2006), and over 40 of <br />these are established in the upper basin alone. <br />Preventing introductions has proven to be very <br />difficult, and it is now recognized that coping with <br />invasions will require the ability to predict range <br />expansions and the intensity of effects based on life <br />histories of native and invasive species and character- <br />istics of recipient systems (Moyle and Light 1996; <br />Ricciardi and Rasmussen 1998; Kolar and Lodge 2001; <br />Iguchi et al. 2004; Vander Zanden et al. 2004; Bestgen <br />et al. 2006). Case studies of the relative effects of <br />invasions by multiple species can provide valuable <br />insights that will assist managers in anticipating and <br />controlling new invaders. <br />Debate continues regarding the relative importance <br />of habitat loss versus nonnative fishes in rivers of the <br />region, but the two factors usually operate concurrently <br />and even synergistically and are thus confounded. The <br />Yampa River is unique in that it allows for an <br />assessment of the magnitude of nonnative fish effects, <br />as it has the most natural hydrograph of any river of its <br />size in the upper Colorado River basin (Boehm 2004). <br />The lack of main-stem dams below the headwaters and <br />the absence of large diversions have maintained the <br />natural spring peak in discharge, although summer <br />flow has been reduced by agricultural withdrawals <br />(Stewart et al. 2005). Despite the availability of <br />relatively high-quality habitat, populations of small- <br />bodied native fishes and juvenile life stages of larger <br />species have declined precipitously during the past <br />decade. Native speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus, <br />mottled sculpin Cottus bairdii, bluehead suckers <br />Catostomus discobolus, and flannelmouth suckers <br />Catostomus latipinnis were strikingly lower in abun- <br />dance or were extirpated in some reaches of the Yampa <br />River, and nonnative fish abundance was higher in <br />2002-2003 than in 1998-1999 (Anderson 2005). <br />Predation by nonnative fishes has been implicated in <br />the decline of small-bodied fishes and may also be <br />responsible for local declines in large-bodied species, <br />such as Colorado pikeminnow (Bestgen et al. 2007). <br />However, information on the relative predatory impact <br />of various introduced species was lacking, and control <br />of myriad species would be impractical. Further, some <br />of these species are popular sport fish, so their control <br />would require explanation and justification to the <br />public. <br />One widely held opinion was that northern pike Esox <br />lucius posed the gravest threat to native fishes of the <br />Yampa River. This assumption presumably arose <br />because northern pike are notoriously piscivorous, <br />large, and able to prey on a wide range of fish sizes <br />(Scott and Grossman 1998). Diet studies in the system <br />confirmed that northem pike preyed upon native fishes <br />(Tyus and Beard 1990). Channel catfish Ictalurus <br />punctatus were also considered a threat, both as <br />predators and as competitors (Tyus and Nikirk 1990; <br />Tyus and Saunders 2000). Removal programs for both <br />species were implemented in 1998 (Hawkins et al. <br />2005; Mueller 2005). The potential impact of small- <br />mouth bass Micropterus dolomieu on native fishes may <br />have been discounted, because historically they were <br />very rare. Additionally, many sources (Carlander 1977; <br />Scott and Grossman 1998; Tomelleri and Eberle 1990; <br />Sigler and Sigler 1996) have noted the predominance <br />of crayfishes in the diet of smallmouth bass; this notion <br />is well entrenched in sporifishing lore. An unprece- <br />dented increase in the abundance of smallmouth bass in <br />parts of the Yampa River during the past decade <br />prompted interest in determining their diet and the <br />predation pressure they exerted on native fishes in the <br />system relative to predation by channel catfish and <br />northem pike. A predominately local but avid angling <br />clientele developed as abundance of smallmouth bass <br />increased, necessitating objective information and a <br />thorough analysis of the effects of this nonnative <br />predator before management actions aimed at reducing <br />its abundance could be considered. <br />Assessing the potential predatory impacts on native <br />species by channel catfish, northem pike, and small- <br />mouth bass requires information on the diets of each <br />predator species. However, to determine the relative <br />intensity of piscivory on prey populations, information <br />on consumption rates and demographics of each <br />population are also required. Further, in some situa- <br />tions, predation may have already depleted prey <br />species of concern and predators will have switched <br />to alternate prey; in those cases, contemporary diet <br />information gives a misleading impression of preda- <br />tors' potential impacts on species of concern. Bioen- <br />ergetics models can integrate ecological, physiological, <br />and demographic information to compute consumptive <br />demand of predator populations, a relevant metric <br />when assessing relative impacts. A great strength of <br />simulation modeling is that alternative scenarios can be <br />evaluated to ask questions such as, "What if native <br />prey fish populations rebound and predators begin <br />feeding on them again?" or "How many of those prey <br />could the predators consume?" <br />In this study, our objectives were to (1) assemble <br />available data on diets and demographics of three <br />nonnative predators from the Yampa River and diet <br />information from a reference system and (2) employ <br />bioenergetics models to quantify the relative predatory <br />threat of each species. The information was then <br />provided to managers so that predatory fish control <br />efforts could be prioritized and applied in an <br />ecologically and fiscally efficient manner and so that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.