Laserfiche WebLink
295 <br /> <br />factors. Serns (1982a, b) showed a similar relation <br />between growth (as well as year-class strength) of <br />age-0 walleye, Stizostedion vitreum, and small- <br />mouth bass, M. dolomieui, and aspects of the an- <br />nual water temperature regime. Water temper- <br />ature is a cue for spawning of temperate-zone fish- <br />es. Colorado squawfish begin spawning when tem- <br />peratures reach 20-22° C (Hamman 1981, Tyus & <br />McAda 1984, Haynes et a1.1984) -normally during <br />July or August in the upper basin (Fig. 3) -and <br />embryos hatch 4-5 days later (Hamman 1981). As <br />the relative suitability of the temperature regime <br />increases, the date when spawning temperatures <br />are achieved advances and the length of the grow- <br />ing season increases (Fig. 3). In the historic lower <br />Colorado River, spawning temperatures were <br />reached in early May (Fig. 3) and young fish had <br />most of the longer growing season available for <br />first-year growth. Although its precise causal fac- <br />tors are unknown, the relation shown in Figure 4 <br />provides a perspective for the much larger differ- <br />ences in age-0 growth that probably occurred his- <br />torically between the upper and lower basins. <br />In the upstream regions of historic range that <br />constitute the remaining habitat of Colorado <br />squawfish, the small size of the age-0 fish going into <br />winter might be an important factor affecting <br />recruitment to the adult stock. Studies onage-0 fish <br />have shown that overwinter survival is directly re- <br />lated to fish size (Toneys & Coble 1979, Oliver et <br />al. 1979, Shuter et al. 1980), and that first-year <br />growth can directly affect adult year-class strength <br />in smallmouth bass and largemouth bass (Shuter et <br />al. 1980, Gutreuter & Anderson 1985). The largest <br />age-0 largemouth bass most often recruit to the <br />adult stock (Gutreuter & Anderson 1985 and refer- <br />ences therein). If a similar relation holds true for <br />Colorado squawfish in the upper basin, the more <br />frequent occurrence in the Green River than in the <br />Colorado of comparatively large age-0 young in fall <br />(Fig. 4) might explain the relatively large adult <br />squawfish stock of the Green (Holden &Stalnaker <br />1975, USFWS, unpublished data). <br />But examples probably exist of species that live <br />under conditions well below their optimum for <br />growth -where age-0 growth is slow and subse- <br />quentrecruitment to the adult stock might be quite <br />restricted -yet their populations are large. Our <br />simulations provide insight into why this may no <br />longer be the case for Colorado squawfish, a spe- <br />cies presumed to have formerly had large pop- <br />ulations in the upper basin. They show how slow <br />growth in the upper basin can make Colorado <br />squawfish there especially vulnerable to the effects <br />of increased early-life mortality. Introduced fish <br />species and other habitat manipulations of techn- <br />ologicman have doubtless contributed to increased <br />early-life mortality of Colorado squawfish, though <br />the precise nature of these negative interactions <br />and their relative importance is unknown. River <br />reaches inhabited by Colorado squawfish have <br />been successfully colonized by numerous intro- <br />ducedspecies, including piscivores such as channel <br />catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, green sunfish, Lep- <br />omis cyanellus, and largemouth bass (Holden & <br />Stalnaker 1975, Tyus et al. 1982). Green sunfish, <br />for example, can greatly suppress native cyprinid <br />populations in rivers (Lernly 1985). <br />Our simulations also show how an increase in <br />early-life mortality can reduce both the number of <br />age groups (eliminating the oldest, largest fish) and <br />the relative abundance of those that remain (Table <br />1) -changes that have indeed occurred in the up- <br />per-basin Colorado squawfish population. But why <br />are the natural compensatory mechanisms that oc- <br />cur in populations of numerous other species not <br />operating to offset the effects of increased early-life <br />mortality on the Colorado squawfish population <br />(e.g. McFadden 1977)? Most common among these <br />are the related responses of increased growth and <br />fecundity in the fish that escape early-life mortal- <br />ity. Each of these would have the effect of in- <br />creasing the potential for population growth. Such <br />compensatory responses would be anticipated if <br />competition for resources had a limiting effect on <br />growth and fecundity. However, if growth of Col- <br />orado squawfish in the upper basin is ultimately <br />limited by the relative scarcity of optimal temper- <br />atures - a resource whose availability to individual <br />fish is independent of population density -such <br />compensatory mechanisms would not be oper- <br />ative. The capacity for compensatory responses in <br />a population might be severely limited when condi- <br />tions for growth of individual fish are appreciably <br />