Laserfiche WebLink
Snail Darters and Pork Barrels Revisited 63 <br />use and related activities in the United States throughout the <br />foreseeable future. [Goggins and Russell, 1982, p. 1525] <br />That conclusion still holds. <br />After recounting some opinions about the nature and context <br />of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), this essay surveys litigated <br />instances of its application to disputes arising on federal public <br />lands. We then descend from the global to the local: Two contro- <br />versies close to my home illustrate how the act has broad and <br />deep consequences for land use in America. <br />THE ESA AS AN ELEME11iT OF WILDLIFE LAW <br />One of the most fascinating aspects of wildlife law is that it <br />concretely expresses changing public attitudes about the natu- <br />ral world-the universe of ecological processes otherwise un- <br />affected by human intervention. Throughout most of human <br />history, animals (like trees) were thought to exist only to sup- <br />port human life in ways that humans determined.l In this coun- <br />try, market hunting and similar forms of wasteful slaughter <br />were the inevitable by-products of this attitude, especially as it <br />was exacerbated by our laissez-faire frontier philosophy. Realiz- <br />ing that greed was killing the. golden goose along with bison and <br />passenger pigeons, people eventually demanded an end to the <br />unregulated commons. The systems of controls developed by the <br />early state fish and game agencies-the bureaucratic reincarna- <br />tions of the Sheriff of Nottingham-were premised on util- <br />itarian ideals. The pioneer wildlife management professionals <br />regarded game animals, fish, and birds as "crops" to be nur- <br />tured during breeding seasons and then "harvested" when ma- <br />ture. These primitive attempts to avert the tragedy of the <br />commons manifested societal common sense: If we kill all the <br />deer, there will be none to hunt next year. <br />Utilitarianism is still the prevailing philosophy in mundane <br />state hunting and fishing regulation. Many people and much law <br />still regard some wildlife species as deserving only of eradica- <br />tion. (See generally Goggins and Evan, 1982.) But the Endan- <br />gered Species Act of 19732 marks both the culmination of a new <br />