Laserfiche WebLink
populations prove stable or is enhanced, or other requirements for <br />holding them have been met, the inventory of species is reduced <br />accordingly. Pecos gambusia (Gambusia nobilis) was maintained at <br />Dexter 1974-1981; it was removed from the hatchery after <br />extensive field work revealed the four extant populations to be <br />secure. Status of the fountain darter (Etheostoma fonticola) <br />improved considerably after being brought to Dexter in 1974. A <br />population was reestablished in the Comal River, Texas, so this <br />species was also removed from the hatchery in 1981. <br />Humpback and roundtail chubs were maintained at Dexter during <br />1981-1982 to continue Gila taxonomic studies initiated at Willow <br />Beach NFH (Hamman 1981a). Hybridization among bonytail and <br />humpback and roundtail chubs in the upper Colorado River Basin is <br />occurring (Smith et al. 1979). Hopefully, research on hybrids <br />will help clarify the Gila complex problems in the Colorado River <br />basin and provide information useful in management and recovery of <br />humpback chub and bonytail. Upon completion of hybridization <br />studies, humpback and roundtail chubs were removed from the ~ <br />station. The former was reintroduced in 1984 because of their <br />limited natural occurrence. <br />CULTURING <br />Most efforts in developing culture techniques have been <br />concentrated on four large Colorado River fishes: razorback <br />sucker, Colorado squawfish, bonytail and humpback chub (Jensen in <br />Rinne et al., in press). Marsh (1985) conducted studies at Dexter <br />NFH to determine the influence of temperature on egg development, <br />hatching success, and fry development of razorback sucker, <br />Colorado squawfish and bonytail. He found the optimum temperate+re <br />for egg incubation and fry devel^pment for these species to be <br />near 70° F so hatchery well water is heated for this purpose. <br />Razorback sucker <br />Razorback sucker continues to decline in the Colorado River <br />system. There has been no documented recruitment to the aging <br />Lake Mohave razorback sucker population since t~,~ mid-1950's <br />(Hinckley 1983) and ext::~.sive collecting in the uppR~ basin has <br />not produced any young razorbacks (Lynn Kaeding, pers. comm.). <br />Utilizing otoliths, Michael McCarthy (pers. comm.), Arizona State <br />University, found razorback sucker collected from Lake Mohave, <br />Arizona-Nevada in 1980-81 to range from 24 to 43 years of age <br />(1937-57 year classes). If some of the 1937 year class are still <br />living, which is highly probable, they are now 48 years old. <br />-36- <br />