My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7133
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7133
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:14:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7133
Author
Jensen, B. L.
Title
Role of Fish Culture in Endangered Fishes Recovery
USFW Year
1986
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the Bonneville Ch. of the AFS
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REINTRODUCTION <br />Large numbers of imperiled southwestern fishes are now produced <br />annually to enhance reintroduction efforts for these endemic <br />species._ However, successful hatchery propagation does not <br />guarantee successful reintroduction. The ultimate goal in the. <br />recovery effort is to restore depleted or exti: gated members of <br />the native ichthyofauna to viable, self-sustaining populations <br />within their historic range. Therein lies the ultimate problem--- <br />overcoming the problem of degradated habitat, introduced fishes <br />(particularly predatory species), and politics. The first two <br />remain major obstacles while the latter has improved somewhat with <br />the 1982 ammendments to the ESA. <br />Reintroduction efforts are political because they normally involve <br />stocking listed species that require protective action of the ESA, <br />and that resource managing agencies must therefore consider in <br />their planning and work activities (Johnson 1979). A portion of <br />this problem was overcome in 1981 when the U. S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (FWS) and the AGFD signed a Memorandum of Understanding <br />(IOU) regarding the ,reintroduction of razorback sucker into <br />selected waters in the Gila River system. Under this arrangement <br />the FWS agreed not to propose listing the razorback sucker while <br />attempts were underway to reestablish the species by stocking a <br />minimum of 100,000 fingerling fish into Arizona waters annually <br />for LO years (Johnson 1985). A similar reintroduction program was <br />established when the FWS, AGFD and U. S. Forest Service signed a <br />MOU to stock endangered Gila topminnow into waters on Forest <br />Service administered lands in Arizona. Although several <br />concessions to circumvent constraints of the ESA were necessary in <br />order to get this MOU signed (i.e., no critical habitat and no <br />curtailment of present land use practices), the precedent for <br />recovering listed species through reintroduction was established <br />(Johnson in Rinne et al. in press). To date, 88 sites have <br />received Gila topminnow transplants and 34 of them are known to be <br />successful (Jim Brooks pers. c:omm.) <br />Stocking <br />As report_~ in the Culture Section ~:~.^~mary, more than 8.7 million <br />fry, 790,000 fingerling and 280 adult razorback sucker have bee~~ <br />released into Arizona waters since 1981. The fry were stocked in <br />the Salt River system to compare fry stockings to fingerling <br />stockings which were taking place in the upper Verde and Gila <br />Rivers. Initially, all fingerling razorbacks were marked with <br />stainless steel coded wire tags. Tagging was discontinued in 1985 <br />after AGFD stocked unmarked fingerlings, reared at Page Springs <br />State Fish Hatchery, in the Verde River. As previously reported, <br />-42- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.