Laserfiche WebLink
1606 JOURNAL FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA, VOL. 29, NO. 11, 1972 <br />of pickup probes made from two 3 mm diameter bronze <br />rods spaced 10 cm apart and insulated so that only the <br />bottom 10 mm of each rod was exposed. The pulse <br />characteristics were displayed on the oscilloscope as a <br />graph of voltage against time. Voltage is referred to as <br />the decrease across 10 em. <br />The wave form on the oscilloscope is not a true <br />capacitor discharge-shaped pulse because of the induc- <br />tance of the external circuit. For this reason rise time <br />was disregarded and I considered the peak of the pulse <br />as time zero. The remaining portion of the pulse closely <br />approximates a theoretical capacitor discharge shape. <br />Pulse width is defined here as the time in micro- <br />seconds (µsec) it takes a pulse to decay to one-third of <br />its peak value, as is standard in describing capacitor <br />discharges. Values for this parameter ranged from 0.5 <br />to 2.2 msec in the study. These pulse widths were found <br />most etI'ective for electrical stimulation. <br />Water resistance, used to calculate the theoretical <br />power requirements of the prototype electrical. fishing <br />system, was measured by placing a 1 ohm resistor on <br />the output side between the pulse generator and one <br />electrode. The amperage in the resistor at a specific <br />d-c voltage output was measured via pickup leads from <br />the oscilloscope. The total voltage from electrode to <br />electrode was divided by the amperes in the resistor in <br />order to obtain the resistance between the electrodes. <br />For example, 2.0 v per 10 cm (v/10 cm) in the tank <br />gives 90 v across the tank (i.e. 2.0 x 10 x 4.5 m = <br />90 v) which, divided by 38 amp through the resistor, <br />gives 2.4 ohms resistance in the tank. <br />To determine the combinations of electric parameters <br />which best induced electrotaxis, I positioned the fish <br />facing, and within 1 m of, the cathode. Preselected pulse <br />rates and voltages were applied to the experimental <br />tank only when the fish were correctly positioned. Two <br />event-timing clocks connected to the pulse generator <br />were activated at the same time as the pulser to provide <br />a time base for measuring responses. The observer <br />could stop each clock when the animal had completed <br />a specific reaction. <br />To evaluate the effectiveness of the pulse characteris- <br />tics tested, 1 measured the time the fish took to swim the <br />length of the tank. In addition, the proportion which <br />went into tetanus was recorded. I selected one lap to <br />record tetanus because any fish will eventually go into <br />tetanus if subjected to electricity for a long period of <br />even low voltage (Collins et al. 1954). <br />In another series of tests to further evaluate pulse <br />characteristics, Iforced the fish to swim up and down <br />the tank, and these are subsequently referred to as <br />leading studies. Leading was accomplished by changing <br />the polarity of the field after each lap, or 4.5 m, when <br />the lisp was within 0.5 m of the anode. The process <br />was continued until the fish could no longer swim or <br />until it had swum 20 laps. The times it took to swim <br />two and live laps, and the number of Japs it swam, were <br />recorded. <br />Even with all this information available for certain <br />species, it was difficult to determine the best combination <br />of electric parameters inducing electrotaxis. Conse- <br />quently, a^ index of optimal responses was obtained <br />for selected species by dividing the time it took <tn in- <br />dividual to swim five laps (23 m) by the number of <br />laps each fish had swum and then computing the average <br />for the electrical combination. The lower the index, the <br />better the electrical combination. For example, if a <br />given electrical combination showed a time of 30 sec <br />to swim five laps and a distance swum of 15 laps, the <br />index was 2. <br />T'he basic idea behind the experimental design was <br />that fish stimulated with the optimum pulse characteris- <br />tics would swim further and faster. I considered the <br />shortest times to swim one, two, and five laps; and the <br />average maximum number of laps swum as the most <br />suitable. <br />Selection of Test Voltages and Pulse Widths <br />The success of electrical fishing is dependent upon the <br />proper electrical combinations for inducing taxis. The <br />voltage, pulse rate, and pulse width required to induce <br />electrotaxis vary with species, fish size, and, probably, <br />other factors (Riedel 1952; Collins et al. 1954; Bary <br />]956; l-ligman 1956; Halsband 1967; Monan and <br />Engstrom 1963; Kessler 1965; Klima 1968). Hence, a <br />combination of electrical factors which will induce <br />electrotaxis in one species may induce either fright <br />response or no response in another. <br />The overall effect of increasing voltage at a fixed pulse <br />rate was examined for the scaled sardines and these <br />results provided the general guideline for the experi- <br />mental minimum and maximum test voltages. <br />A gradual increase was evident in the time it took <br />scaled sardine to swim one lap as the voltage was in- <br />croused from 1.5 to 4.5 v/10 cm at 15 pulses/sec. The <br />greatest effect was the decrease in the distance swum <br />with an increase in voltage (Fig. 1). The maximum <br />number of laps scaled sardine swam was at 1. S v/10 cm, <br />and the lowest at 4.5 v. The response times to swim <br />two laps showed a general increase with an increase in <br />voltage. <br />The overall effect of a voltage increase was to decrease <br />the distance over which scaled sardine could be controlled <br />and to decrease the speed it took to swim more than <br />9 m. An increase in voltage also increased the proportion <br />of fish in tetanus even at low repetition rates. <br />Response of fish in an electrical field depends upon <br />voltage and the length of the animal because voltage <br />potential increases proportionately with the animal's <br />length. For example, a 10 cm fish, faced parallel to Uie <br />current lines in a homogenous field at 30 v/m, has a <br />potential of 3 v from head to tail but a 20 cm fish has a <br />potential of 6 v. As a result, it is important to determine <br />the significance of size or length as related to the most <br />suitable electrical combination. Consequently, one <br />coastal pelagic fish, scaled sardine, and one bottomfish, <br />longspine porgy, of ditlerent size groups were examined. <br />Itcsults on scaled sardines indicated that small fish <br />could be Icd more effectively at 3 v/10 cm than large <br />fish but the responses indicated thaC 3 v/lU cm are not <br />completely adequate to control these smaller fish (Table <br />l). Stimulation of less than 3 v/10 cm or more than <br />1 .5 v/10 cm would probably be more suitable. <br />n comparison of the response times to swim one lap <br />was made between small (86-101 mm fork length) and <br />