Laserfiche WebLink
~~~ <br />Copeia, 1986(4), pp. 1021-1029 <br />© 1986 by the American Society of~ <br />Ichthyologists and Herpetologists <br />.t <br /> <br />RECENT CAPTURE OF A BONYTAIL (GILA <br />ELEGANS) AND OBSERVATIONS ON THIS <br />NEARLY EXTINCT CYPRINID FROM THE <br />COLORADO RIVER.-The bonytail (Gila ele- <br />gans) is one of several Gila endemic to the Col- <br />orado River basin. The aquatic ecosystems of <br />the basin have been profoundly altered by water- <br />development projects, introduction of non-na- <br />tive fishes, poor land-use practices and other <br />activities of technologic man (Miller, 1961; <br />Minckley and Deacon, 1968; Ono et al., 1983). <br />The negative effects of these changes have pre- <br />sumably been especially significant for the <br />bonytail, for it is now near extinction. <br />Observations of early workers indicate bony- <br />tail were formerly widespread and abundant in <br />the large rivers (Jordan, 1891; Jordan and Ev- <br />ermann, 1896; Gilbert and Scofield, 1898). <br />Vanicek and Kramer (1969) collected 67 bony- <br />tail (> 200 mm TL) from the Green River dur- <br />ing 1964-66 and were the last to report appre- <br />ciable numbers in riverine habitat. During the <br />past several years, fewer than ten presumed <br />bonytail have been captured from the Green <br />(Tyus et al., 1982 and references therein; Paul <br />B. Holden, pers. com.) and about 25 bonytail <br />have been collected from Lake Mohave, a lower <br />Colorado River reservoir in which the few <br />bonytail are large, old and apparently not re- <br />producing (Minckley, 1983; Bozek et al., 1984). <br />Because morphological characters do not clear- <br />ly distinguish young bonytail from other sym- <br />patric Gila, reproductive success of Green River <br />bonytail is unknown. We document here the <br />recent capture of a bonytail, describe the cap- <br />ture site and other species that occur there and <br />offer additional observations on the bonytail of <br />the Colorado River basin. <br />We captured a bonytail on July 17, 1984, from <br />the Black Rocks area of the Colorado River, <br />western Colorado. This 2 km long reach, a ma- <br />jor habitat for humpback chub (G. cypha), is a <br />narrow, deep-water, turbulent area formed by <br />passage of the river through a relatively ero- <br />sion-resistant layer of metamorphic rock. The <br />Black Rocks area is unlike the broad, relatively <br />shallow reaches of the nearby Gunnison and <br />Green rivers from which bonytail historically <br />were collected Qordan, 1891; Jordan and Ev- <br /> <br />o <br />ermann, 1896). We photographed the fish (Fig. <br />1), a mature female with light tubercles on pec- <br />toral fins and head and took the following mea- <br />surementsand counts (after Lagler et al., 1977) <br />before releasing it alive: total length, 458 mm; <br />fork length, 418 mm; weight, 560 g; distance <br />between insertion of pectoral and pelvic fins, <br />86.6 mm; depth of nucha] depression (Smith <br />et al., 1979), 6.7 mm; caudal-peduncle depth, <br />14.8 mm; caudal-peduncle length, 108.9 mm; <br />head length, 85.8 mm; dorsal-fin base, 53.2 mm; <br />anal-fin base, 55.2 mm; dorsal-fin rays, 10; and <br />anal-fin rays, 10. <br />These data and the photograph were provid- <br />ed to six ichthyologists who have worked ex- <br />tensively on the taxonomy of Gila and each was <br />asked his opinion as to the identity of the fish. <br />Four of five respondents agreed that the fish <br />was a bonytail. The fifth believed the fish was <br />largely bonytail, but that the ventral mouth <br />overhung by the snout indicated the presence <br />of some humpback chub genes. Two respon- <br />dents mentioned the "Roman nose" or "flat <br />head"-characters that could be interpreted as <br />indicative of the occurrence of humpback chub <br />genes-but the presence of these characters did <br />not affect their identifications. One of these re- <br />spondents suggested such characters reflect in- <br />dividual variation that is especially pronounced <br />among old fish. <br />The bonytail was large and probably old. The <br />largest seen by Vanicek and Kramer (1969) was <br />388 mm TL (estimated on the basis of scale <br />annuli to be 7 yr old). Seven bonytail collected <br />by Bozek et al. (1984) from Lake Mohave were <br />475-535 mm TL. The largest bonytail seen by <br />Minckley (1973), from another lower Colorado <br />River reservoir (Lake Havasu), was 489 mm TL. <br />Although the age of that fish was not given, <br />marks on otoliths of large bonytail from Lake <br />Mohave suggested these fish might be more than <br />30 yr old (W. L. Minckley, pers. com.). <br />Our capture demonstrates that bonytail re- <br />main in the upper Colorado River basin, al- <br />though their scarcity suggests a viable popula- <br />tion might not exist. In addition to the bonytail, <br />we collected 602 adult-size (>250 mm TL) Gila <br />from the Black Rocks area; on the basis of gross <br />morphologic characters, we tentatively identi- <br />fied 272 as humpback chub, 271 as roundtail <br />chub (G. robusta) and 59 as possible intergrades <br />