|
24 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 60
<br />transmitters (Trammell et al. 1993) were incon-
<br />clusive: 3died within 36 d, and the survivor,
<br />found in the impoundment on 12 June, moved
<br />downstream of the reservoir and was located
<br />12 km below the dam on 9 August 1990. To
<br />date, no hatchery-reared fish have displayed
<br />the type of spawning migration documented
<br />for the White River, nor have they utilized
<br />unoccupied habitats upstream of Kenney
<br />Reservoir. However, behavior of wild fish was
<br />similar to our results. One of 3 wild adults
<br />implanted with transmitters died within 8 d,
<br />but the remaining 2 behaved similarly to the
<br />fish we studied: 1 moved upstream of the re-
<br />servoir to occupy riverine habitats and the
<br />other moved downstream over the reservoir
<br />spillway. Contact was lost with the latter fish
<br />from 12 June to 11 September; thus, it could
<br />have migrated to a spawning area during this
<br />time.
<br />Apparently, there is a net upstream move-
<br />ment of subadult fishes into preferred habi-
<br />tats, but post-spawning Colorado pikeminnow
<br />often exhibit home-range fidelity by returning
<br />to the area (i.e., home range) they occupied
<br />before migration (Tyus 1986, 1990). Because of
<br />these behaviors, efforts to restore access (i.e.,
<br />fish ladders, etc.) of adult fish to historic habi-
<br />tats may not be productive. Instead, younger
<br />fish would slowly colonize as they mature, thus
<br />increasing the time necessary to occupy re-
<br />stored habitats. However, our study demon-
<br />strates that adult fish will use habitats if access
<br />is provided them. - = -
<br />Migration and habitat use of White River
<br />fish indicate that powerful selection mecha-
<br />nisms have developed over perhaps thousands
<br />of years of evolution. This is evident in migra-
<br />tion patterns and habitat use. When provided
<br />access, wild adult Colorado pikeminnow uti-
<br />lized historic; unoccupied habitats rather than
<br />returning to sites below the dam where they
<br />had been restricted following closure of Taylor
<br />Draw Dam. This assumes that these study fish
<br />and other wild fish present before the dam
<br />was built have been attempting to ascend the
<br />White River since dam completion in 1985.
<br />On the other hand, hatchery-reared fish exhib-
<br />ited a different behavior. They did not show
<br />the same tendency to occupy riverine habitats
<br />upstream of Kenney Reservoir nor undertake
<br />such migrations. If restoration efforts connect
<br />occupied Habitats with historic reaches via fish
<br />passages, wild adult fishes may access historic
<br />habitats, establish new home ranges, and con-
<br />tinue successful reproduction by using high-
<br />quality habitats. However, hatchery-reared
<br />fishes may not.
<br />This study suggests that wild adult Colorado
<br />pikeminnow might use a fish passage facility if
<br />it were in place at Taylor Draw Dam. Research
<br />conducted by Burdick and Pfeifer (1999) shows
<br />that Colorado pikeminnow will use the fish
<br />passage structure at Redlands Diversion Dam
<br />on the Gunnison River near Grand Junction,
<br />Colorado, to access riverine habitats upstream
<br />of this 12-ft dam. Since 1996, when the fish
<br />passage facility was opened, 47 subadult/adult
<br />(TL 383-763 mm) Colorado pikeminnow have
<br />passed upstream through this structure. Six
<br />fish that used the structure in July and August
<br />1997 and 1998 successfully passed downstream
<br />over the dam after that date and then used
<br />the passage structure again irr either 1998 or
<br />1999. One fish has been found upstream as far
<br />as 49 km.
<br />This information can help guide present
<br />recovery efforts in areas where historic habi-
<br />tats have been blocked. Further, translocation
<br />of wild fish offers another feasible alternative
<br />to stocking hatchery-reared fish whose behav-
<br />ior may be problematic, such as not being
<br />imprinted to a successful spawning area nor
<br />being able to congregate with juvenile fish
<br />reared in high-quality nursery habitats. Finally;
<br />recovery efforts can be more successful if life-
<br />history needs of Colorado pikeminnow are
<br />better understood in areas where fish are most
<br />abundant and least disturbed.
<br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
<br />This study was initially proposed by the
<br />Colorado Division of Wildlife. We thank T.
<br />Nesler and B. Elmblad for their assistance in
<br />developing the study. A..Brady, Rio Blanco
<br />Water Conservation District, and M. Caddy,
<br />Colorado Division of Wildlife, provided local
<br />assistance in data collection and landowner
<br />permission. Assistance in field data collection
<br />was provided by H. Husband, B. Hilbert, D.
<br />Beers, J: Baker, Q. Bradwich, B. Sheffer, R.
<br />Arment, and H: Hines. We are especially grate-
<br />ful for thorough and thoughtful reviews by H.
<br />Tyus, K. Bestgen, M. Trammell, and K. Irving.
<br />Finally, we wish to thank Dinosaur National
<br />Monument of the U.S. National Park Service,
<br />Ouray National Wildlife Refuge of the U.S.
<br />~~
<br />~ ~
<br />k
<br />~'
<br />
<br />yt'f;%;~"',,i~ .
<br />t}.'t,._rx~.~..~ .~
<br />
|