Laserfiche WebLink
24 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 60 <br />transmitters (Trammell et al. 1993) were incon- <br />clusive: 3died within 36 d, and the survivor, <br />found in the impoundment on 12 June, moved <br />downstream of the reservoir and was located <br />12 km below the dam on 9 August 1990. To <br />date, no hatchery-reared fish have displayed <br />the type of spawning migration documented <br />for the White River, nor have they utilized <br />unoccupied habitats upstream of Kenney <br />Reservoir. However, behavior of wild fish was <br />similar to our results. One of 3 wild adults <br />implanted with transmitters died within 8 d, <br />but the remaining 2 behaved similarly to the <br />fish we studied: 1 moved upstream of the re- <br />servoir to occupy riverine habitats and the <br />other moved downstream over the reservoir <br />spillway. Contact was lost with the latter fish <br />from 12 June to 11 September; thus, it could <br />have migrated to a spawning area during this <br />time. <br />Apparently, there is a net upstream move- <br />ment of subadult fishes into preferred habi- <br />tats, but post-spawning Colorado pikeminnow <br />often exhibit home-range fidelity by returning <br />to the area (i.e., home range) they occupied <br />before migration (Tyus 1986, 1990). Because of <br />these behaviors, efforts to restore access (i.e., <br />fish ladders, etc.) of adult fish to historic habi- <br />tats may not be productive. Instead, younger <br />fish would slowly colonize as they mature, thus <br />increasing the time necessary to occupy re- <br />stored habitats. However, our study demon- <br />strates that adult fish will use habitats if access <br />is provided them. - = - <br />Migration and habitat use of White River <br />fish indicate that powerful selection mecha- <br />nisms have developed over perhaps thousands <br />of years of evolution. This is evident in migra- <br />tion patterns and habitat use. When provided <br />access, wild adult Colorado pikeminnow uti- <br />lized historic; unoccupied habitats rather than <br />returning to sites below the dam where they <br />had been restricted following closure of Taylor <br />Draw Dam. This assumes that these study fish <br />and other wild fish present before the dam <br />was built have been attempting to ascend the <br />White River since dam completion in 1985. <br />On the other hand, hatchery-reared fish exhib- <br />ited a different behavior. They did not show <br />the same tendency to occupy riverine habitats <br />upstream of Kenney Reservoir nor undertake <br />such migrations. If restoration efforts connect <br />occupied Habitats with historic reaches via fish <br />passages, wild adult fishes may access historic <br />habitats, establish new home ranges, and con- <br />tinue successful reproduction by using high- <br />quality habitats. However, hatchery-reared <br />fishes may not. <br />This study suggests that wild adult Colorado <br />pikeminnow might use a fish passage facility if <br />it were in place at Taylor Draw Dam. Research <br />conducted by Burdick and Pfeifer (1999) shows <br />that Colorado pikeminnow will use the fish <br />passage structure at Redlands Diversion Dam <br />on the Gunnison River near Grand Junction, <br />Colorado, to access riverine habitats upstream <br />of this 12-ft dam. Since 1996, when the fish <br />passage facility was opened, 47 subadult/adult <br />(TL 383-763 mm) Colorado pikeminnow have <br />passed upstream through this structure. Six <br />fish that used the structure in July and August <br />1997 and 1998 successfully passed downstream <br />over the dam after that date and then used <br />the passage structure again irr either 1998 or <br />1999. One fish has been found upstream as far <br />as 49 km. <br />This information can help guide present <br />recovery efforts in areas where historic habi- <br />tats have been blocked. Further, translocation <br />of wild fish offers another feasible alternative <br />to stocking hatchery-reared fish whose behav- <br />ior may be problematic, such as not being <br />imprinted to a successful spawning area nor <br />being able to congregate with juvenile fish <br />reared in high-quality nursery habitats. Finally; <br />recovery efforts can be more successful if life- <br />history needs of Colorado pikeminnow are <br />better understood in areas where fish are most <br />abundant and least disturbed. <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br />This study was initially proposed by the <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife. We thank T. <br />Nesler and B. Elmblad for their assistance in <br />developing the study. A..Brady, Rio Blanco <br />Water Conservation District, and M. Caddy, <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife, provided local <br />assistance in data collection and landowner <br />permission. Assistance in field data collection <br />was provided by H. Husband, B. Hilbert, D. <br />Beers, J: Baker, Q. Bradwich, B. Sheffer, R. <br />Arment, and H: Hines. We are especially grate- <br />ful for thorough and thoughtful reviews by H. <br />Tyus, K. Bestgen, M. Trammell, and K. Irving. <br />Finally, we wish to thank Dinosaur National <br />Monument of the U.S. National Park Service, <br />Ouray National Wildlife Refuge of the U.S. <br />~~ <br />~ ~ <br />k <br />~' <br /> <br />yt'f;%;~"',,i~ . <br />t}.'t,._rx~.~..~ .~ <br />