My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:12:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
2002
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Valley Unit, Stage Two, Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, Mesa County, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER III <br />r1 <br />LJ <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />3. Revegetation of disturbed private lands would be accom- <br />plished if requested by the landowner. Landowners would <br />be provided with three choices--no revegetation; revegeta- <br />tion with a grass-f orb mix; or revegetation and replanting <br />with species of grass, shrubs, or trees particularly bene- <br />ficial to wildlife. <br />4. Semipermanent and permanent earth-lined ponds would be de- <br />veloped within four detention basins to provide water for <br />wildlife. <br />5. Sma11 earth-lined watering ponds or guzzlers would be es- <br />tablished at approximately S- to 8~mile intervals in the <br />area north of the Government Highline Canal. These areas <br />would be partially fenced to control livestock use around <br />the ponds. A decision on the location of these ponds would <br />be made in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management, <br />the Colorado Division of Wildlife, and the Fish and Wild- <br />life Service. The ponds would be developed into good qual- <br />ity wildlife habitat, would help offset habitat losses due <br />to unit development, and would add value to surrounding <br />areas. <br />• Some of the river bottom lands being considered for acquisition have <br />potential for commercial gravel operations. The Fish and Wildlife Serv- <br />ice has agreed that developing gravel resources might occur on portions <br />of these lands concurrent with activities performed for the wildlife <br />habitat development program. Details of this program would be negotiated <br />with affected landowners, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Fish and Wild- <br />life Service, and the Colorado Division of Wildlife. All plans would <br />conform to requirements stipulated by the Colorado State Department of <br />Natural Resources, Mined Land Reclamation Division. Figure 1 shows po- <br />tential wildlife areas. <br />Construction facilities <br />The Grand Valley field station, constructed in 1980 as part of Stage <br />One development, would be used as construction headquarters for Stage <br />Two. It is located centrally in relation to the irrigation systems in <br />the valley near the midpoint of the middle portion of the Government <br />Highline Canal. <br />Geology and construction materials <br />Geology <br />Much of the proposed canal and lateral lining construction would <br />occur in Mancos Shale, which is hard and dense at depth but near the <br />surface is often fractured and jointed or weathered into a lean clay or <br />silty soil. All excavations required during construction along the canal <br />and laterals, whether in soil or bedrock, would be done with common ex- <br />cavation methods and would not necessitate blasting. <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.