My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:12:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
2002
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Valley Unit, Stage Two, Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, Mesa County, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER III ALTERNATIVES <br />Fifty-two lateral and thirty farm turnouts would be replaced. The <br />initial capacities of the lateral turnouts would range from 1 to 34 cfs, <br />and the farm turnout capacities would range from 1 to 6 cfs. <br />West end portion of the Government Highline Canal.--The west end por- <br />tion of the Government Highline Canal extends for 7 miles from the end of <br />Stage One to the terminus of the Government Highline Canal 6 miles north- <br />west of Mack. Due to the relatively small flows, the last mile of this <br />reach would be placed in pipe and would be considered a lateral served <br />by the canal. Major existing waterway structures in this section include <br />a 360-foot-long concrete flume across Mack Wash and a mile-long siphon <br />under East Salt Creek. <br />A check and watteway structure would be constructed at both the <br />East Salt Creek and the Badger Wash siphons. One centerline check <br />structure would be added in the 120-cfs reach. <br />Ten lateral and eighteen farm turnouts would be replaced with eight <br />lateral and thirteen farm turnouts, with the initial lateral turnout <br />capacities ranging from 3 to 40 cfs and the farm turnout capacities from <br />2 to 6 cfs. <br />Cross-Drainage Facilities <br />Cross-drainage facilities would be constructed to protect the • <br />membrane-lined canal. Present cross-drainage facilities in the minor <br />drainages consist of a series of culverts which are in poor condition <br />due to age, siltation, and poor maintenance and would be replaced with a <br />detention ditch and dike system. <br />As in the Stage One area, the cross-drainage system would be con- <br />structed uphill from and parallel to the canal. Detention ditches de- <br />signed for a 25-year flood would collect floodflows and convey them to <br />drainage channels where they would cross either under the canal through <br />concrete boxes or corrugated culverts, cross over the canal through <br />overchutes, or enter the canal through drain inlets. Four detention <br />dams located north of the cross-drainage detention ditch and dike system <br />have been designed for 100-year flood protection because the potential <br />for hazard to life and property damage from failure of these dams is <br />significantly greater. <br />The system would consist of 34.5 miles of detention ditches and <br />dikes and four detention dams designed for a 100-year flood, which would <br />be used to create small impoundments for leveling out stormflows in <br />natural drainages. <br />The east end portion of the Government Highline Canal would have 6.5 <br />miles of detention ditches and dikes starting 3.5 miles downstream of the <br />Price-Stub Ditch Pumping Plant and two detention dams located at Moulton <br />Valley and Lewis Wash. The middle portion of the Government Highline <br />Canal would have detention ditches and dikes along its entire 20-mile <br />length, plus two detention dams located at Leach Creek and the East <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.