My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:12:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
2002
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Valley Unit, Stage Two, Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, Mesa County, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER I PURPOSE AND NEED <br />LJ <br />Negative Determination included a commitment to complete an FEIS on the <br />remainder of the unit before beginning Stage Two construction. The <br />Negative Determination on Stage One development stipulated that further <br />development of the Grand Valley Unit would depend upon information ob- <br />tained from monitoring in the Stage One area and included the following <br />environmental commitments. <br />1. Approximately 280 acres of land would be acquired and de- <br />veloped for wildlife to compensate for wildlife habitat <br />losses. A watering pond would be constructed north of the <br />Government Highline Canal to replace wildlife watering <br />areas. <br />2. Water quality, wildlife, and vegetation would be monitored <br />in the Stage One area. <br />3. Disturbed areas would be reshaped and reseeded. <br />4. No additional lands would be irrigated by the Grand Valley <br />Unit and right-of-way changes would be minor. <br />5. Further development of the Grand Valley Unit would depend <br />upon information from Stage One monitoring. Impacts of <br />• the remainder of the unit would be addressed in the FEIS <br />before a decision would be made on further construction. <br />The wildlife commitments made under Stage One did not receive con- <br />gressional approval and therefore were not acted upon. Public Law <br />98-569, enacted in 1984, included provisions for wildlife habitat re- <br />placement under the Grand Valley Unit; therefore, the wildlife plan for <br />Stage Two development- includes measures to replace both Stage One and <br />Stage Two wildlife losses. <br />Monitoring was undertaken as planned, and results have been pub- <br />lished in a final report by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW <br />1984b). Construction areas were reshaped, and most of the disturbed <br />lands in the Stage One area were reseeded. Private lands affected by <br />lateral construction were not reseeded because the use of this land was <br />left up to individual landowners. In some cases, these lands have been <br />included in adjacent irrigated fields. It is estimated that field ex- <br />pansion in the Stage One area has totaled 75 acres. <br />Land Features <br />The Grand Valley (see Frontispiece Map) is bounded on the north by <br />the Book Cliffs, on the southwest by the Uncompahgre Plateau, and on the <br />east by Grand Mesa, a flat-topped mountain more than 10,000 feet in ele- <br />vation. The elongated valley is relatively flat, sloping gently upward <br />to the northeast to low rolling hills near the Book Cliffs. To the <br />southwest, the Uncompahgre Plateau rises above the valley floor, while <br />two large, low-lying mesas separated by the Gunnison River are prominent <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.