My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4001
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
4001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:10:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
4001
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report 1976-1980.
USFW Year
1981.
USFW - Doc Type
Washington, D.C.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Introduction <br />The Colorado River system is com- <br />posed of portions of seven States - <br />Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, <br />New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. It <br />has a drainage area of about 242,000 <br />square miles and represents about <br />one-fifteenth of the area of the United <br />States. This report incorporates <br />annual estimates of consumptive uses <br />and losses of water from the system <br />from 1976 to 1980, Wherever available, <br />water use reports prepared in accord- <br />ance with legal requirements concerning <br />the operation of the Colorado River <br />were utilized. Base data needed to <br />estimate onsite consumptive uses were <br />taken largely from existing reports and <br />studies and from ongoing programs. <br />Where current data were not available, <br />estimated values were developed by <br />various techniques and reasoned judg- <br />ment. In general, methodology followed <br />the techniques normally used within the <br />system for estimating water use. <br />Nothing in this report is intended <br />to interpret the provisions of the <br />Colorado River Compact (45 Stat. 1057), <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact <br />(63 Stat. 31), the Water Treaty of 1944 <br />with the United Mexican States (Treaty <br />Series 994; 59 Stat. 1219), the decree <br />entered by the Supreme Court of the <br />United States in Arizona v. California, <br />et al. (376 U.S. 340), the Boulder <br />Canyon Project Act (45 Stat. 1057), the <br />Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act <br />(54 Stat. 774; 43 U.S.C. 618a), the <br />Colorado River Storage Project Act, (70 <br />Stat. 105; 43 U.S.C. 620), or the <br />Colorado River Basin Project Act (82 <br />Stat. 885; 43 U.S.C. 1501). <br />Authority <br />The authority for this report is <br />contained in Public Law 90-537, the <br />Colorado River Basin Project Act of <br />1968. Title VI, Section 601(b)(1) of <br />the act reads as follows: <br />(b) The Secretary is directed to- <br />(1) Make reports as to the annual <br />consumptive uses and losses of <br />water from the Colorado River <br />system after each successive <br />five-year period, beginning with <br />the five-year period starting <br />October 1, 1970. Such reports <br />shall include a detailed break- <br />down of the beneficial consump- <br />tive use of water on a State-by- <br />State basis. Specific figures <br />on quantities consumptively used <br />from the major tributary streams <br />flowing into the Colorado River <br />shall also be included on a <br />State-by-State basis. Such <br />reports shall be prepared in <br />consultation with the States of <br />the lower basin individually and <br />with the Upper Colorado River <br />Commission, and shall be trans- <br />mitted to the President, the <br />Congress, and to the Governors <br />of each State signatory to the <br />Colorado River Compact. <br />Plan of Study <br />A proposed plan of study was pre- <br />sented for comment to representatives <br />of the Upper and Lower Basin States <br />and the Upper Colorado River Commis- <br />sion. Comments received principally <br />concerned water accounting procedures. <br />This issue is longstanding and is <br />related to the interpretation and <br />implementation of the legal documen- <br />tary controlling the operation of the <br />river. In the Upper Basin, the prin- <br />cipal comment concerned the use of <br />accurate data bases, particularly <br />irrigated acreage. The Lower Basin <br />comments concerned the lack of credit <br />for unmeasured return flows originat- <br />ing from mainstream diversions and the <br />failure to quantitatively recognize <br />that ground water overdraft in the <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.