My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7319
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:10:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7319
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Uprating Existing Generators, Flaming Gorge Powerplant, Colorado River Storage Project Final Environmental Assessment.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Finding of No Significant Impact <br />at Flaming Gorge Powerplant Uprating, <br />Dtah-Wyoming, <br />Colorado River Storage Project <br />The proposed action would not constitute a major Federal action having signifi- <br />' cant environmental impacts. <br />t <br />' The following is a summary of the expected impacts: <br />1. At normal reservoir elevations, maximum flows from the powerplant in <br />the Green River below Flaming Gorge Dam would increase from 4,125 cis to 4,950 <br />cis. Utilization of the increased capacity from uprating the generators would <br />cause higher flows than those presently occuring approximately 7 percent of <br />the time. These flows would be of short duration (usually less than 4 hours) <br />and would be dampened as they move down the river. <br />During periods of increased flows, wetted perimeter along the river between <br />the dam and the Greendale gage would increase by an average of 3 feet horizon- <br />tally, which is less than a 2 percent increase. This would not cause any <br />significant erosion of streamside vegetation. <br />The present pattern and duration of flows below 1,250 cis would not be changed <br />from present operations and the present sources of groundwater that support <br />riparian vegetation would not be altered; therefore, impacts on existing ripar- <br />ian plant and animal communities would not be measurable. <br />2. The increase in flows would occur at the high end of the flow pattern <br />and would not affect the minimum flows. The water from the reservoir would <br />come from the same penstocks as at present; therefore, there would be no change <br />in the temperature or the chemistry of the water. Habitat simulation models <br />showed essentially no change in useable area for fish. Based upon this informa- <br />tion, no measurable impact is expected on the quality of fishery resources <br />below the dam. <br />3. Using data cited in Paragraphs 1 and <br />by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and <br />there would be no impact on threatened or <br />uprating. This was confirmed by the U.S. <br />concurred with Reclamation's determinatio• <br />dated August 11, 1986. <br />2 above, plus other studies conducted <br />Reclamation, it was concluded that <br />endangered species because of the <br />Fish and Wildlife Service which <br />n of "no effect" in a memorandum <br />4. Operational patterns would continue essentially as historically; therefore, <br />no additional impacts on recreation are expected. <br />5. There would be no impact on known historical or archaeological resources <br />as surveys indicate they are located above the area that would be affected <br />by increased flows. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.