7732 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

c. ~ransactian Structure. Mountain water rights be purchased • they are changed to instream use? of water rights proceeding be stru remedies may be appropriate in the proceeding for the FWS to have and statute? In any subsequent manage water rights? • C7 i, Should the Juniper-Crass or otherwise acquired before If not, how should the change gtured? What contractual change of water rights r Colorado's instream flow ent and enforcement of these d. Conversion of Conditianall Water Riahts_to Is the CWCB authorized to convert conditional water instream use? If so, what criteria; will be applied in making such conversions, and will the conversion Juniper-Cross Mountain water rights to instream use criteria? 3. Instream Water Rights for the 115-Mile Reach. a. Initial Water_Availabili Septe~tze~ What percentage of tim the CWCB to make a new instream fl contractual remedies in the water appropriation may be appropriate f Colorado's instream flow statute? and enforcement of the new instrea rights to by the CWCB o~ the meet such must flaws be avaiJ.able for appropriation? What urt proceedings for the new the FWS to have under n any subsequent management appropriation? b. Subsequent Water Availability Analysis. Haw does the amount of water initially found avaiilable in the 15-Mile Reach conlp2~re with that which i s avai l abbe under the working compact scenarios? What alternative assumpttions about development above Cameo under conditional decrees, or about depletions under existing alasn].i~tp Apcrees, map be appropriate? What alternative assumptions about the operation of the so-called Cameo water rights may be appropriate, other thrart any assumptions about the disposition of water that might hejsalvaged under these rights? c. Water salvage. What are study on water salvage for securin endangered fish needs in the 15-Mi 4. Storage Releases. he implications instream flows Reach? of the CWCB to meet a. Steamboat Lake. Can releases from Steamboat Lake be protected from rediversion under thQ water rights currently held by the Colorado Division of Parks a~td Recreation far the Lake? Must the CWCB be a party to any conitract for release of storage water from Steamboat Lake for instx;aam use even if the Tike's water rights are changed to include instream use? I b. Aspinall Unit. What arethQ answers to these same questions for water released out o~ the Aspinall Unit? How might 2