Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program-- Page $ <br />• Water acquisition for the endangered fishes <br />Group Memory, February 28, 1992 <br />question #1: All agreed that not anissue -delete <br />question #2: not anissue -delete <br />question #3: not an issue, covered on question #5 <br />question #4: re-word: "under what circumstances will CWCB be a party to lease of water <br />(storage or direct flow) for instream flow purposes. " <br />Question #5: Re-word - 1st line -after "allow" - "A release of stored water for.... Add: <br />"Issues include: Decreed beneficial uses and "Judge Brown Rights" <br />question #6: retain. <br />Page 14-15 -III Process <br />Pg 15 - * Reference water available. Add: "can be done concurrent with flow <br />recommendations." <br />Pg. 15 - 1st bullet: add after "needs" "pursuant to the R.I.P. " <br />* 2nd bullet: -ditto - <br />* 3rd bullet: add "and other interested agencies. " <br />Pg. 15 - uestions: covered <br />IV MISCELLANEOUS <br />Question #l: Add words "or saved" after "salvaged". <br />Question #1: Add other words: "or other actions" after "salin. cntrl. wtr. " add words at end <br />of sentence - "E.G. (1) state law; (2)Other institutional impediments". <br />Question #2 Move to page #13 as new question #1, as an add-on. Add "Can FWS rely on the <br />interim flow in its biological opinion?" <br />Question #3: Strike "Ruedi---Rifle gap" and substitute federal reservoirs. " <br />Question #4: Not issue: Can return to CWCB for adjustments (2nd bite) based on refined data. <br />Question #5: Covered. <br />Add new question: Is "sufficient progress issue an impediment to protecting flows? Or, is <br />protection of flows in timely enough manner to allow new federal actions <br />to go forward? <br />