Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program-- <br />Water acquisition for the endangered fishes <br />Group Memory, February 28, 1992 <br />Page 5 <br />* Perceptions in reference to uncertainty future water rights - community <br />expectations. <br />* Federal "intrusion" in state/local issues. Power sharing. <br />* Lack of information regarding future development/fishes needs. <br />Potential Impediments <br />I. Substantive Finding <br />Element #1 <br />Definition of terms also an issue. How operationalize for biologist (criteria)? <br />All agree CWCB can appropriate instrument flows for protection of endangered species, <br />not an impediment. <br />• Add: Questions reference "type" of use <br />Question reference quantity - re-draft. <br />Page #11- Question #3 <br />* Is the state law in reference to "Minimum requirements to protect the <br />environment to a reasonable degree" inconsistent with flows needed for fish <br />recovery? <br />The above replaces Questions 1-3 on Page 11. <br />Replacement for Question #4 -Page 11: <br />Are there impediments in prior CWCB decisions to protecting flows for fish recovery? <br />Reference Question 5: Replace with: <br />Last sentence (only) as rewritten: How should the Board address the uncertainties in the <br />quantity of flow recommendations. (e.g. A. use of professional judgement and B. methodology, <br />and C. consistency of methodology.) <br />