My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7732
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7732
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:08:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7732
Author
Center for Public-Private Sector Cooperation, U. o. C.
Title
Recommendations on the Legal, Policy, and Institutional Issues Related to Instream Flow Protection in Colorado.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program-- <br />Water acquisition for the endangered fishes <br />Group Memory, February 28, 1992 <br />Page 5 <br />* Perceptions in reference to uncertainty future water rights - community <br />expectations. <br />* Federal "intrusion" in state/local issues. Power sharing. <br />* Lack of information regarding future development/fishes needs. <br />Potential Impediments <br />I. Substantive Finding <br />Element #1 <br />Definition of terms also an issue. How operationalize for biologist (criteria)? <br />All agree CWCB can appropriate instrument flows for protection of endangered species, <br />not an impediment. <br />• Add: Questions reference "type" of use <br />Question reference quantity - re-draft. <br />Page #11- Question #3 <br />* Is the state law in reference to "Minimum requirements to protect the <br />environment to a reasonable degree" inconsistent with flows needed for fish <br />recovery? <br />The above replaces Questions 1-3 on Page 11. <br />Replacement for Question #4 -Page 11: <br />Are there impediments in prior CWCB decisions to protecting flows for fish recovery? <br />Reference Question 5: Replace with: <br />Last sentence (only) as rewritten: How should the Board address the uncertainties in the <br />quantity of flow recommendations. (e.g. A. use of professional judgement and B. methodology, <br />and C. consistency of methodology.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.