Laserfiche WebLink
For example, the following equation was developed using the data collected at the SR-6 cross section: <br />Stage = 0.3223 Q0.3682 <br />where, Q =Recorded discharge at Jensen Gage (cfs) <br />Stage =Water surface level above Gage Zero (ft) <br />The stage value can then be added to the gage zero (minimum elevation in the cross section) to obtain a <br />predicated water surface elevation for any given discharge. <br />Elevation =Stage + Gage Zero <br />Figure 9 displays the rating curve for cross section SR-6, which was used to compute the flooding <br />elevation, flooding discharge values, and flood inundation levels for both the SR site and the adjacent FT <br />site upstream of the SR site. All six SR rating curves can be found in the technical report. Table x <br />displays the rating curve parameters for all the SR cross sections. The coefficient of determination, RZ <br />value, for each derived equation is also listed in Table 1. This value indicates how well the data were <br />represented by the power function. The RZ values ranged from 0.9907 to 1.0000 for the cross sections. <br />An Rz value of 1 indicates a perfect fit, therefore, the high RZ values obtained for the rating curves <br />demonstrates a significant level of accuracy for any predicted water surface elevations within the range of <br />discharge data which were collected. <br />Gunnison River <br />Sufficient stage discharge data were collected at the BC site to create stage discharge curves for the BC <br />cross sections. The BC-5 stage discharge equation was calculated to be: <br />• Stage=4618.1 + .1181 Q.ass~ <br />where Q= Recorded discharge at the Gunnison River near Grand Junction Gage (cfs) <br />Stage =the water surface level above Gage Zero (ft) <br />The stage value can then be added to the gage zero (minimum elevation in the cross section) to obtain a <br />predicted water surface elevation for any given discharge. <br />Elevation =Stage + Gage Zero <br />Figure 10 displays the rating curve for cross section BC-5, which was used to compute the flooding <br />elevations at the site. The remainder of the rating curve equations are listed in Table 2 and the curves <br />and raw data can be found in the technical report. <br />Calibration of a Hydraulic Model <br />Green River <br />Access rights to the SN, IM, and SL properties was not granted until after the 1997 runoff season. <br />Therefore, water surface profiles had to be determined using the HEC-RAS River Analysis System model <br />Version 2.1 (US Army Corps of Engineers, 1997). Surveyed cross section data were put into this model, <br />which calculates step backwater water surface profiles from which flow depths, velocities, and bankfull <br />discharges can be predicted. For the SN/IM reach, the high water mark on the Jensen Highway 40 <br />bridge, which corresponds to the 1997 peak discharge, was used to calibrate the model. However, as <br />discussed stage discharge data collected in 1998 was used to improve the accuracy of the model. For <br />the SL reach, stage/discharge data were available from the Horseshoe Bend cross section (HB-4) which <br />was included in the model. The stage/discharge relationship for HB-4 was developed from eight stage <br />3-2 <br />