Laserfiche WebLink
engineering and design, construction supervision and administration, <br />engineering during construction, site geologic explorations, topographic <br />surveys, and miscellaneous costs. The total job cost for Alternate No. 1 <br />is $839,200. <br />b. This design, as studied and estimated, includes the <br />trash shear boom constructed from logs (see Plate 14 for details).- The <br />log boom, designated as Option A, is considered an appropriate design <br />choice. Option B, a Slickbar trash boom may also prove to be appropriate <br />for this installation. If so, the selection of Option B would be a sub- <br />stantial cost savings to the project. The final choice of trash boom <br />will be made during preparation of plans and specifications. <br />c. The design life of this project is estimated as 50 <br />years, taking into consideration the age (68 years o1 d) of the existing <br />dam structure. During the life of the project, the large mechanical <br />equipment items should only require proper maintenance. The only item <br />that would require replacement, during the project life, is the log trash <br />shear boom. Based on a study of trash shear booms at a Corps of Engineers <br />dam, the life cycle cost is lowest for a log and timber type boom. The <br />log and timber components have a 10-year life and the boom cable has a <br />25-year life. All other components have a design life longer than 50 <br />years and would not require replacement. The present worth of the trash <br />shear boom replacement costs for this alternate is $22,700. <br />C. Alternate No. lA. <br />1. Description of Major Features. <br />a. This alternate also relates to preliminary Alternate F <br />described previously. This alternate was proposed for study during the <br />60-percent review meeting to examine potential cost savings. See Plates <br />6 and 7 for plan and profile views. This vertical slot/orifice ladder <br />has three downstream entrances - a west side entrance, an east Slde <br />entrance, and a downstream entrance. The ladder configuration was deter- <br />mined by the number of common walls that could- be utilized and still <br />place the entrances and exit in desirable locations. This change should <br />reduce mechanical piping and therefore reduce costs over Alternate No. 1. <br />Upstream of the last pool, the fishway exits into the forebay at least 40 <br />feet from the spillway crest or sluice gates. The slope of the ladder <br />floor is 1 foot vertical to 20 feet horizontal. The ladder also has pro- <br />visions to adjust the length and number of pools. The pool length is <br />adjusted by placing or removing lightweight weir boards (refer to para- <br />graph 3, Operational Flexibility). <br />• <br />16 <br />