My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7316
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7316
Author
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Title
Redlands Dam Fishway Feasibility Study, Gunnison River, Colorado.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Walla Walla.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
based on a reasonable design low flow of 300 cfs below the dam, which is • <br />50-percentile expected flow for August (refer to Appendix B for hydrolo- <br />gic information). The fish ladder entrance was then set at 4,560.0 feet <br />elevation to maintain a 3-foot minimum pool depth. Using the low tail- <br />water elevation and an upstream water surface elevation of 4,575.0 feet, <br />the change in water surface elevation from below to above Redlands <br />Diversion Dam is approximately 12 feet. The upstream water level of <br />4,575.0 feet elevation is the desired minimum water depth maintained by <br />RWPC. The basic design of the ladder uses the biological and technical <br />criteria of 8-foot-wide, 10-foot-long, 3-foot-deep pools; 0.5 foot of <br />head drop per pool; 1-foot-wide vertical slot; and 1-foot-wide by 1.5- <br />foot-high orifice (slot and orifice inverts placed flush with the ladder <br />floor). With 0.5 foot of head drop per pool and water surface difference <br />of 12 feet (at low tailwater), the ladder has 23 vertical slot/orifice <br />weirs and one drop in water surface elevation at the slide gate fish <br />entrance. For this operational condition, total ladder flow is approxi- <br />mately 18 cfs. <br />b. The reasonable design high flow was chosen as 6,000 cfs <br />passing over the spillway,. which is approximately the 80-percentile <br />expected flow for May. At the higher flows, the location of this fish <br />ladder reduces the original design capacity of the spillway. The con- <br />sequence of this reduced capacity is a higher forebay water elevation of <br />approximately 4,575.5 feet. From preliminary computations, tailwater was <br />calculated as elevation 4,567.0 feet. The change in water surface eleva- <br />tion from below to above the dam is then approximately 8.5 feet. With <br />the basic ladder design (23 weirs, 8-foot-wide by 10-foot-long pools) and <br />accounting for the backwater effect into the ladder, the head drop will <br />gradually vary from 0.2 foot at the downstream end of the ladder to 0.5 <br />foot at the upstream end of the ladder. For this operational <br />condition, the total ladder flow is approximately 20 cfs. <br />c. For flows above 6,000 cfs and below 8,000- cfs, the <br />ladder should be closed at the forebay entrance. The upstream barrier <br />wall. elevation is 4,578.0 feet and will protect the ladder from high <br />riverflows. If the ladder was open at the upstream end, the ladder <br />structure would be overtopped by water and not functional for fish <br />passage. <br />d. For flows above 8,000 cfs to 28,000 cfs, the spillway <br />will carry the majority of the riverflow with approximately 1 foot of <br />freeboard- all-owed at the maximum flow. The ladder itself will be over- <br />topped, also passing a portion of the floodflow. <br />e. For the standard operational conditions, auxiliary <br />water must be added at the junction pool diffusers to maintain normal <br />• <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.