My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7414 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7414 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:01:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7414
Author
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Title
Sandstone Dam and Reservoir, Municipal, Agricultural and Industrial Water Supply Project Carbon County, Wyoming
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n <br />2.20 Most industries did .not have expansion or water needs <br />projections available (B&V, 1984b). Industrial expansions that <br />are associated- with the energy and mining industries have -been <br />indefinitely delayed until demands for their products increase. <br />2.21 The area encompassing Baggs'and Dixon has the potential to <br />attract industrial and power generation projects. The area <br />surrounding these communities was often indicated by industrial <br />representatives as having sites where projects could be located <br />if energy demands increase (Grieve, 1987). Some industries <br />indicated that they have sufficient ground water or surface water <br />rights to conduct their current industrial activities. Any <br />industrial expansion, however, could cause an additional large, <br />rapid demand for water in the surrounding communities due to <br />population growth from both construction activities and permanent <br />workforce expansion. In 1980, the WWDC identified the following <br />potential. industrial water users and their needs in excess of <br />current allocations for the Little Snake River basin: <br /> Additional <br /> Quantity of <br /> Water Needed <br /> (acre-feet/ <br />Industrial User Pur pose year) <br />Kemmerer Coal Co. _ <br />Coal-fired power plant 25,000 <br />Tri-State G&T Coal-fired power plant 30,000 <br />Rocky Mountain Energy Synthetic fuels plant D <br />Pacific Power ~ Light Coal-fired power plant 0 <br />Urangesellshaft USA, Inc. Uranium mi ne 10 <br /> 55,010 <br />2.22 More recent information (Grieve, 1987) indicates that some <br />of these users may still have an interest in the Little Snake <br />River basin for future development. The uncertain nature of <br />industrial planning should be taken into consideration when <br />evaluating projected demands. However, commitment by the state <br />• <br />2-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.