Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Year Year <br />Item 1990 2014 <br />Recreation/Dead Poc L 2100 AF 815 AF <br />Sedimentation 1746 AF 7050 AF <br />Rangely 1735 AF 1735 AF <br />Other Water Sales 4019 AF -0- <br />2.4.4 J~,yd r gg l a c t r i c ,~,g~~g~ps,~o ten ~,~, <br />2.4.4.1 A 2,000 kw [7,200 MJ] power plant under the conditions <br />dictated by A lterne ti v® C would generate an estimated 10 mi L lion kwh <br />per year [36 million MJ) et a cost per kwh of 24 mills. <br />2.4.5 Agcess Roads <br />2.4.5.1 The access roads required for Alternative C wou ld be the same <br />as for Alternative A except 3,400 lineal feet [1,036m] of Colorado <br />Highway 64 would have to be relocated instead of 3,500 lineal feet <br />[1,067m). <br />2.4.6 ~.BR_.I~.f.S~.CI..~.~P~.g.P9 ~~. M J.~iS~~..Q.L~~l~ L~.~.. <br />2.4.6.1 Revegetetion - The applicant proposes to revegetete all <br />borrow areas above the high water line after construction. <br />2.4.6.2 Fishery Facilities - The outlet works concept is the same as <br />Alternative A end the fish should have no problem escaping the water <br />moving through the treshracke. <br />2.4.6.3 Additional Mitigation Measures - Mitigation measures are <br />discussed in detail in Chapter 5. <br />2.4.7 S~m.~.L~.~iY~.~.~ <br />2.4.7.1 Tha estimated annual cost per acre-foot L-ass engineering end <br />construction management for Alternative C would be X133. A <br />construction cost estimate breakdown may be found in Appendix A, <br />2.5 ALTERNATIVE D: D®^ 1.3 Miles [2.1 km] North of Taylor <br />Drams; Crest El. 5321 11,6220] <br />2.5.1 ~SrJ.~LQ.L~ ~O.~~ei~~~.~Q.~Li.Pi<L~1. <br />2.5.1.1 Tha Alternative D dam site ie Located approximately 1.3 miles <br />[2.1 km] north of Taylor Draw. This dam site was examined as an <br />alternative to the applicants proposed site when the feasibility study <br />for Taylor Draw was written in 1979. <br /> <br />-22- <br />