Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Discharge Correlation with Upstream Levee Logger Data and USGS Gaging Station Discharges <br />' The level logger data was reduced and converted to a river stage similar to the derivation <br />of the rating curve for the staff gage. A simple Fortran computer program LOGGER was written <br />to extract the data from the level logger file, convert the level logger pressure data to stage, and <br />compute the river discharge from the rating curve derived for the level logger location. The level <br />logger records date, time, day of year, depth in feet below the water surface, and water <br />temperature every 30 minutes (every 15 minutes in 1995). The program averaged the data to <br />' determine a daily discharge or temperature. The average daily discharges are computed using the <br />power regression equation for the level logger and are written to file using the 24 hour period <br />' starting at time 00:00 (midnight). The data and- computer output results are available from the <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Water Resources Division, Denver, Colorado. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />Utilizing the computed discharge from the upstream level loggers and strip chart <br />recorders, and estimated USGS gaging station discharge, Figures 5 and 6 were developed <br />showing the relationship between the river discharge in Canyonlands and the upstream discharge <br />hydrographs. The Canyonlands level logger discharge is shown to correlate well with the Below <br />While River and Desolation level logger discharge. There is some variation in the Canyonlands <br />data around the peak when the shift in the level logger pipe occurred due to the loosened <br />mounting bolts. The Canyonlands discharge does not correlate as well with the USGS Green <br />River gage discharge data. <br />These figures indicate that there is some variation in the Green River gage data over the <br />course of the high flow season. The USGS Green River gage appears to be subject to rating <br />curve shifts related to sediment movement in the alluvial channel. This phenomena was also <br />noted in the FLO Engineering 1995a report. As the channel bed elevation varies with bed scour <br />or deposition, additional discharge measurements are needed to recalibrate the USGS gage. <br />During the 1996 high flow season, three discharge measurements were made by the USGS at the <br />Green River gage on Apri125, May 23 and June 25 and the corresponding rating curve shift was <br />2.4, -0.23 and 1.4 respectively. Reviewing Figure 6 indicates a peak discharge at the Green <br />River gage of 1,000 cfs to 2,500 cfs in excess of the peak flows at Desolation and Canyonlands. <br />On the recessional limb of the hydrograph, the discharge at Green River is consistently less than <br />the discharge at both the Desolation and Canyonlands level loggers. A 1,000 cfs drop in the <br />discharge is observed in the Green River data over a three day period from June 12 to June 14 <br />that is not noted in any of the other gages. <br />Temperature Data <br />The level loggers also record temperature data in conjunction with the time interval stage <br />measurement. The Canyonlands temperature data was reduced and plotted as a mean daily <br />temperature in Figure 7 along with the other level logger temperatures and the Green River gage <br />hydrograph. The LOGGER program was applied to compute the mean daily temperature. The <br />correlation between the level logger temperature data is excellent. <br />14 <br /> <br />