My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9608
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9608
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:57:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9608
Author
FLO Engineering Inc.
Title
Establishment of a Green River Gage in Canyonlands National Park, Utah 1995-1996.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Breckenridge, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />t Results <br />' General <br />The principal product of the data collection effort is a discharge rating curve for the staff <br />' gage and level logger in Canyonlands. With the rating curve, researchers in Canyonlands can <br />estimate the river discharge while working on site. In the FLO report (1995b), the discharge in <br />Canyonlands was correlated with the Green River and San Rafael gage data. A comparison of <br />t the 1995 and 19961evel logger data with the Green River gage discharge indicates that there is a <br />frequent shift in stage occurring at the Green River gage. The USGS estimates of the discharge <br />' at this gage poorly correlated with both upstream and downstream level loggers. As a result, an <br />equation correlating the Canyonlands level logger discharge and the Green River gage discharge <br />was not determined for the 1996 data as it was for the 1995 discharge data. <br />Derivation of a Rating Curve <br />It was necessary to derive two ratings curves, one for the staff gage and one for the level <br />logger. The level logger rating curve relates the level logger stage data to a river discharge. <br />' Figure 4 depicts the rating curve for the staff gage. An equation has been developed for each <br />rating curve which can be applied to estimate the discharge for a given stage reading. For the <br />staff gage the discharge Q equation is: <br />Q = 551.92 (stage)1~488 <br />' where, <br />stage = 2.99 + lower staff gage reading or <br />stage = 8.38 + upper staff gage reading <br />' The are two staff gages, one higher than the other, to enable very high flow or very low flow <br />river stage to be read. The coefficient of determination (rz) was 0.996 for the staff gage equation. <br />The stage values determined from the above equations represent the water surface elevation <br />above elevation 3940.00. The coefficient and exponent in this equation varied only slightly from <br />the inclusion of the 1996 data and the coefficient of determination improved slightly. Either the <br />' equation or Figure 2 can be used to determine the river discharge after reading the staff gage and <br />converting the reading to obtain the stage. <br />' The rating curve from the level logger is: <br />' Q = 210.68 (stage)1~818 <br />where the stage is the water surface elevation above 3940.00. The coefficient of determination <br />' for this equation is 0.997. The level logger equation was applied to the level logger data base in <br />the LOGGER Fortran program to compute a daily discharge. The level logger rating curve is <br />plotted on Figure 3. <br />' 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.