Laserfiche WebLink
14a. Reverse cumulative distributions of probable reservoir storage following 150 cubic feet <br />per second pumping over year (day 1 3651, and low-flow releases (September 1-301: <br />scenario 1 ....................................................................................... 32 <br />14b. Reverse cumulative distributions of probable reservoir storage following 150 cubic feet <br />per second pumping overyear (day 1 365-, one-half PBOlow-flow release amount <br />(69.4 acre-ft per day, August 1-October 31-, and no peak-flow releases: scenario 2 ..............33 <br />14c. Reverse cumulative distribution of probable reservoir storage with 150 cubic feet per <br />second pumping over year (day 1-3651, all PBO low-flow releases (360 acre-ft per day, <br />September 1 301, and nopeak-flow release: scenario 3 .......................................... 33 <br />14d. Reverse cumulative distribution of probable reservoir storage with 150 cubic feet <br />per second pumping over year (day 1-3651, one-half PBO low-flow release amount <br />(180 acre-ft per day, September 1-301, and maximum peak-flow releases: scenario 4...34 <br />15. Release history for model scenario 4: year-round pumping (day 1 3651, law-flow release <br />amount (180 acre-ft per day, September 1-301, and maximum peak-flow releases ............... 35 <br />16a. Cumulative distribution function forwater-budget components during year-round <br />pumping, low-flow release of 5412.5 acre-ft over30 days in September, and nopeak-flow <br />release: scenario 1 .............................................................................. 36 <br />16b. Cumulative distribution function forwater-budget components during year-round <br />pumping, low-flaw release of 5412.5 acre-ft over 78 days in August October, and nopeak-flow <br />release: scenario 2 .............................................................................. 36 <br />16c. Cumulative distribution function forwater-budget components during year-round pumping, <br />low-flow release of 10,825 acre-ft over 30 days in September, and nopeak-flow release: <br />scenario 3 ....................................................................................... 37 <br />16d. Cumulative distribution function forwater-budget components during year-round pumping, <br />low-flow release of 5412.5 acre-ft in September and peak-flow (spring) release: scenario 4......37 <br />17a. Cumulative distribution function of simulated background instreamdissolved-solids <br />concentrations observed atthe Government Highline Canal ...................................... 38 <br />17b. Cumulative distribution function of simulated background instreamdissolved-solids <br />concentrations observed atthe Grand Valley Irrigation Canal .................................... 39 <br />18a. Cumulative distribution function of percent change in instreamdissolved-solids concentration <br />observed atthe Government Highline Canal during low-flow period following year-round <br />pumping and four release scenarios ............................................................. 40 <br />18b. Cumulative distribution function of percent change in instream dissolved solids concentration <br />observed atthe Government Highline Canal during peak-flow period foliowingyear-round <br />pumping and four release scenarios ............................................................. 41 <br />18c. Cumulative distribution function of absolute change in instream dissolved solids concentration <br />observed atthe Government Highline Canal during low-flow period following year-round <br />pumping and four release scenarios ............................................................. 42 <br />18d. Cumulative distribution function of absolute change in instreamdissolved-solids concentration <br />observed atthe Government Highline Canal during peak-flow period following year-round <br />pumping and four release scenarios ............................................................. 43 <br />19a. Cumulative distribution function of percent change in instreamdissolved-solids concentration <br />observed atthe Grand Valley Irrigation Canal during low-flow period foryear round pumping and <br />four release scenarios ........................................................................... 44 <br />19b. Cumulative distribution function of percent change in instreamdissolved-solids concentration <br />observed atthe Grand Valley Irrigation Canal during peak-flow period foryear round pumping and <br />four release scenarios ........................................................................... 45 <br />19c. Cumulative distribution function of absolute change in instreamdissolved-solids concentration <br />observed atthe Grand Valley Irrigation Canal during low-flow period following year-round pumping <br />and four release scenarios ....................................................................... 46 <br />19d. Cumulative distribution function of percent change in instreamdissolved-solids concentration <br />observed atthe Grand Valley Irrigation Canal during peak-flow periodfollowingyear-round pumping <br />and four release scenarios ...................................................................... 47 <br />